Loading...

"No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey. - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey.
link : "No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey.

"No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey.

And asked whether he'd testify under oath about his conversations with Comey, Trump said "100%."

So why was he coy about whether there are tapes of the meetings?

"I am not hinting at anything. I will tell you about it over a very short period of time," Trump said, twice declining to elaborate.

He later said reporters were "going to be very disappointed when you hear the answer."

What's the most likely reason Trump didn't just give an instant, straight answer about whether there are tapes of the meetings?

Trump is playing with the media, giving them something to talk (foolishly) about.

Trump doesn't know the precise facts about how much is actually on tape.

There aren't tapes, but Comey's belief that there may be tapes forces him to restrict what he says.

Trump needs time to determine if it's in his interest to destroy the tapes.

Trump doesn't want to feed the seagulls that are camped in his driveway.

 

pollcode.com free polls

_________________________

* I got this figure of speech from Comey's testimony (which I discussed here). Comey claimed that he used an intermediary to leak his memo to the press because reporters were "camping at the end of [his] driveway," so for him to just hand them something "would be like feeding seagulls at the beach."

And asked whether he'd testify under oath about his conversations with Comey, Trump said "100%."

So why was he coy about whether there are tapes of the meetings?

"I am not hinting at anything. I will tell you about it over a very short period of time," Trump said, twice declining to elaborate.

He later said reporters were "going to be very disappointed when you hear the answer."

What's the most likely reason Trump didn't just give an instant, straight answer about whether there are tapes of the meetings?

Trump is playing with the media, giving them something to talk (foolishly) about.

Trump doesn't know the precise facts about how much is actually on tape.

Loading...

style="float:left;width:475px;">There aren't tapes, but Comey's belief that there may be tapes forces him to restrict what he says.

Trump needs time to determine if it's in his interest to destroy the tapes.

Trump doesn't want to feed the seagulls that are camped in his driveway.

 

pollcode.com free polls

_________________________

* I got this figure of speech from Comey's testimony (which I discussed here). Comey claimed that he used an intermediary to leak his memo to the press because reporters were "camping at the end of [his] driveway," so for him to just hand them something "would be like feeding seagulls at the beach."

Thus articles "No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey.

that is all articles "No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "No collusion, no obstruction, he's a leaker," said Trump about Comey. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/06/no-collusion-no-obstruction-hes-leaker.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: