Loading...
Title : "Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives."
link : "Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives."
"Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives."
"We could ‘unself’ in social contexts that are unsafe or exploitative, that push us into narrow, controlling and hate-filled dogmas. We might insist that our route to God is the only route, and everyone else is demonic. We might get over-attached to the ecstatic, and foolishly seek a spiritual life entirely made up of special experiences. A peak experience is just a peek – we still have to put in the boring, hard work to deconstruct our egotism."The second-to-the-last paragraph of "Dissolving the ego/You don’t need drugs or a church for an ecstatic experience that helps transcend the self and connect to something bigger." The link goes to Aeon, via Meade, whose reasons for sending it probably related to some other paragraph. I'm skeptical about the idea that "dissolving the ego" is the best way to talk about transcendence. I tend to think: In whose interest is it to get us enthused about dispensing with our ego? That train of thought takes me to a very dark place.
"We could ‘unself’ in social contexts that are unsafe or exploitative, that push us into narrow, controlling and hate-filled dogmas. We might insist that our route to God is the only route, and everyone else is demonic. We might get over-attached to the ecstatic, and foolishly seek a spiritual life entirely made up of special experiences. A peak experience is just a peek – we still have to put in the boring, hard work to deconstruct our egotism."
The second-to-the-last paragraph of "Dissolving the ego/You don’t need drugs or a church for an ecstatic
The second-to-the-last paragraph of "Dissolving the ego/You don’t need drugs or a church for an ecstatic
Loading...
experience that helps transcend the self and connect to something bigger." The link goes to Aeon, via Meade, whose reasons for sending it probably related to some other paragraph. I'm skeptical about the idea that "dissolving the ego" is the best way to talk about transcendence. I tend to think: In whose interest is it to get us enthused about dispensing with our ego? That train of thought takes me to a very dark place.
Thus articles "Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives."
that is all articles "Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/07/yet-there-are-risks-to-ego-dissolution.html
0 Response to ""Yet there are risks to ego-dissolution too. It can be a very frightening experience, and we might struggle to integrate it into our ordinary lives.""
Post a Comment