Loading...

"It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself."
link : "It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself."

"It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself."

"For example: It was argued to me this week that the Google memo failed to constitute hostile behavior because it cited peer-reviewed articles that suggest women have different brains. The well-known scientist who made this comment to me is both a woman and someone who knows quite well that 'peer-reviewed' and 'correct' are not interchangeable terms. This brings us to the question that many have grappled with this week. It’s 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man’s intellect above a woman’s. It’s easy to end up in an endless loop of using our prodigious scientific skills to carefully debunk the shoddy science that props up this argument. This is important and valuable work, but it’s also worth considering why this loop exists at all. Science’s greatest myth is that it doesn’t encode bias and is always self-correcting. In fact, science has often made its living from encoding and justifying bias, and refusing to do anything about the fact that the data says something’s wrong...."

From "Stop Equating 'Science' With Truth/Evolutionary psychology is just the most obvious example of science's flaws," by particle physicist and philosopher of science Chanda Prescod-Weinstein in Slate.

"For example: It was argued to me this week that the Google memo failed to constitute hostile behavior because it cited peer-reviewed articles that suggest women have different brains. The well-known scientist who made this comment to me is both a woman and someone who knows quite well that 'peer-reviewed' and 'correct' are not interchangeable terms. This brings us to the question that many have grappled with this week. It’s 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view that ranks a man’s intellect above a woman’s. It’s easy to end up in an endless loop of using our prodigious scientific skills to carefully debunk the shoddy science that props up this argument. This is important and valuable

Loading...

work, but it’s also worth considering why this loop exists at all. Science’s greatest myth is that it doesn’t encode bias and is always self-correcting. In fact, science has often made its living from encoding and justifying bias, and refusing to do anything about the fact that the data says something’s wrong...."

From "Stop Equating 'Science' With Truth/Evolutionary psychology is just the most obvious example of science's flaws," by particle physicist and philosopher of science Chanda Prescod-Weinstein in Slate.

Thus articles "It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself."

that is all articles "It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "It is impossible to consider this field of science without grappling with the flaws of the institution—and of the deification—of science itself." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/08/it-is-impossible-to-consider-this-field.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: