Loading...
Title : The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort."
link : The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort."
The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort."
"Denmark’s Prince Henrik Wanted to Be King. So He’ll Protest for Eternity" (NYT).“For the prince, the decision not to be buried beside the queen is the natural consequence of not having been treated equally to his spouse — by not having the title and role he has desired,” [said the Royal Danish House’s director of communications, Lene Balleby]....Here's what that thing looks like.
For at least seven years, Bjorn Norgaard, a sculptor, has been working on a glass sarcophagus carried by silver elephants that is designed to hold both the queen and the prince in Roskilde Cathedral after their deaths.
The gender equity problem here is that "queen" is considered lower than "king," so it's been acceptable for the king's wife to be called a queen, but if the queen is the one with the recognition as sovereign, it's traditionally been because there is no one in line to be king. If there's a man called "king," it seems that he should be the one with the power, and Henrik has no claim to that. He's trying to drain something out of the word "king" that hasn't been present in the word "queen," to drag "king" down to the level of "queen," and maybe modern ideas about gender equity do support that, but I understand the resistance to importing modern principle into royalty. Where do you stop? You'd have to dismantle the whole institution.
"Denmark’s Prince Henrik Wanted to Be King. So He’ll Protest for Eternity" (NYT).
The gender equity problem here is that "queen" is considered lower than "king," so it's been
“For the prince, the decision not to be buried beside the queen is the natural consequence of not having been treated equally to his spouse — by not having the title and role he has desired,” [said the Royal Danish House’s director of communications, Lene Balleby]....Here's what that thing looks like.
For at least seven years, Bjorn Norgaard, a sculptor, has been working on a glass sarcophagus carried by silver elephants that is designed to hold both the queen and the prince in Roskilde Cathedral after their deaths.
The gender equity problem here is that "queen" is considered lower than "king," so it's been
Loading...
acceptable for the king's wife to be called a queen, but if the queen is the one with the recognition as sovereign, it's traditionally been because there is no one in line to be king. If there's a man called "king," it seems that he should be the one with the power, and Henrik has no claim to that. He's trying to drain something out of the word "king" that hasn't been present in the word "queen," to drag "king" down to the level of "queen," and maybe modern ideas about gender equity do support that, but I understand the resistance to importing modern principle into royalty. Where do you stop? You'd have to dismantle the whole institution.
Thus articles The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort."
that is all articles The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-queens-husband-seeks-gender-equity.html
0 Response to "The queen's husband seeks gender equity, wants to be called the "king consort," the way the wife of a king is called "queen consort.""
Post a Comment