Loading...
Title : 50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC.
link : 50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC.
50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC.
The off-Broadway run began on October 17, 1967.Hair: The American Tribal Love-Rock Musical is a... product of the hippie counterculture and sexual revolution of the late 1960s... The musical's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its nude scene caused much comment and controversy. The musical broke new ground in musical theatre by defining the genre of "rock musical", using a racially integrated cast, and inviting the audience onstage for a "Be-In" finale.Here's how the review looked in the NYT:
If good intentions were golden, 'Hair,' at Joseph Papp's new Florence Sutro Anspacher Theater, would be great. As it is it is merely pretty good; an honest attempt to jolt the American musical into the nine-sixties, and a musical that is trying to relate to something other than Sigmund Romberg.Sigmund Romberg? The reference is lost on me. (Here.)
If it had a story — which to be honest it hasn't — that story would be about the young disenchanted, turned on by pot, switched off by the draft, living and loving, the new products of affluence, the dispossessed dropouts. That, if it had a story, would be what "Hair" is about.
Man, what an old fogey the NYT was! The reviewer was Clive Barnes.
I was 16 at the time, and I probably only heard about the show after it moved to Broadway. I scorned it, because it seemed that old people and commercial interests were trying to trade on the hippie movement, which seemed too pure and beautiful to have anything to do with Broadway. I didn't regard the music as rock music, so it was annoying to hear it called a "rock" musical. Like Clive Barnes, I resisted the show, but for what was — in "generation gap" terms — a completely different reason.
The off-Broadway run began on October 17, 1967.
Hair: The American Tribal Love-Rock Musical is a... product of the hippie counterculture and sexual revolution of the late 1960s... The musical's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its nude scene caused much comment and controversy. The musical broke new ground in musical theatre by defining the genre of "rock musical", using a racially integrated cast, and inviting the audience onstage for a "Be-In" finale.Here's how the review looked in the NYT:
If good intentions were golden, 'Hair,' at Joseph Papp's new Florence Sutro Anspacher Theater, would be great. As it is it is merely pretty good; an honest attempt to jolt the American musical into the nine-sixties, and a musical that is trying to relate to something other than Sigmund Romberg.Sigmund Romberg? The reference is lost on me. (Here.)
If it had a story — which to be honest it hasn't — that story would be about the young
Loading...
disenchanted, turned on by pot, switched off by the draft, living and loving, the new products of affluence, the dispossessed dropouts. That, if it had a story, would be what "Hair" is about.
Man, what an old fogey the NYT was! The reviewer was Clive Barnes.
I was 16 at the time, and I probably only heard about the show after it moved to Broadway. I scorned it, because it seemed that old people and commercial interests were trying to trade on the hippie movement, which seemed too pure and beautiful to have anything to do with Broadway. I didn't regard the music as rock music, so it was annoying to hear it called a "rock" musical. Like Clive Barnes, I resisted the show, but for what was — in "generation gap" terms — a completely different reason.
Man, what an old fogey the NYT was! The reviewer was Clive Barnes.
I was 16 at the time, and I probably only heard about the show after it moved to Broadway. I scorned it, because it seemed that old people and commercial interests were trying to trade on the hippie movement, which seemed too pure and beautiful to have anything to do with Broadway. I didn't regard the music as rock music, so it was annoying to hear it called a "rock" musical. Like Clive Barnes, I resisted the show, but for what was — in "generation gap" terms — a completely different reason.
Thus articles 50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC.
that is all articles 50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article 50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/10/50-years-ago-today-musical-hair-opens.html
Related Posts :
Can you believe that an article titled "Why Oscar Attendees Will Be Wearing an Orange American Flag on Sunday"...- TRUMP WON'T QUIT -- HE'LL JUST GO ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL FOR HIMSELF TWO YEARS EARLY
Russian Media: There Is A Secret Nato-Backed Base In Ukraine- Double-Header Weekend - Sunday Cardinal Couple
"Russian senator Valentina Petrenko's hair is more famous than her politics."
0 Response to "50 years ago today: The musical "Hair" opens at the Public Theater in NYC."
Post a Comment