Loading...

WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?

Loading...
WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES? - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?
link : WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?

see also


WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?

There's a lot of right-wing harrumphing about the New York Times story exposing Harvey Weinstein's decades of sexual harassment. Ooh, he's a big Democratic donor! Ooh, the liberals say they respect women, but...

Also:




Maybe -- but our side will applaud the exposure.

Notice that it's the "liberal media" that revealed this -- The New York Times published first, but The New Yorker is also said to be working on a story.

Now let's talk about Fox News. Who exposed Roger Ailes as a harasser? Or Bill O'Reilly? Or Eric Bolling? It wasn't Breitbart or Sinclair or the Daily Caller or The Weekly Standard or National Review. Weinstein got away with it for years, but the press on "his side" brought him down; Ailes et al. got away with it for years, and "their side" never investigated them, much less exposed them.

That's our press in microcosm. I don't care how much "liberal media bias" you think there is in the mainstream press -- it will still go after liberals and Democrats. The conservative media? Critical pieces are written only when a conservative isn't conservative enough. There's no self-policing on the right. There's just boosterism, augmented by relentless attacks on the left.

And it could be argued that that's why conservatives win in American politics as often as they do.
There's a lot of right-wing harrumphing about the New York Times story exposing Harvey Weinstein's decades of sexual harassment. Ooh, he's a big Democratic donor! Ooh, the liberals say they respect women, but...

Also:


Loading...
type="text/javascript">

Maybe -- but our side will applaud the exposure.

Notice that it's the "liberal media" that revealed this -- The New York Times published first, but The New Yorker is also said to be working on a story.

Now let's talk about Fox News. Who exposed Roger Ailes as a harasser? Or Bill O'Reilly? Or Eric Bolling? It wasn't Breitbart or Sinclair or the Daily Caller or The Weekly Standard or National Review. Weinstein got away with it for years, but the press on "his side" brought him down; Ailes et al. got away with it for years, and "their side" never investigated them, much less exposed them.

That's our press in microcosm. I don't care how much "liberal media bias" you think there is in the mainstream press -- it will still go after liberals and Democrats. The conservative media? Critical pieces are written only when a conservative isn't conservative enough. There's no self-policing on the right. There's just boosterism, augmented by relentless attacks on the left.

And it could be argued that that's why conservatives win in American politics as often as they do.


Thus articles WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?

that is all articles WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES? with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/10/which-side-exposed-weinstein-and-which.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "WHICH SIDE EXPOSED WEINSTEIN AND WHICH SIDE EXPOSED AILES?"

Post a Comment

Loading...