Loading...
Title : "John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry."
link : "John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry."
"John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry."
The NYT reports.“After careful consideration and in light of the attention drawn by recent allegations made against me,” Mr. Conyers said in a statement on Sunday, he is stepping aside on the Judiciary panel “during the investigation of these matters.... “I deny these allegations, many of which were raised by documents reportedly paid for by a partisan alt-right blogger,” Mr. Conyers said in the statement. “I very much look forward to vindicating myself and my family before the House Committee on Ethics.”...What's important — beyond the Conyers resignation — is changing the procedures in Congress and disclosing the suppressed settlements that taxpayer money funded. On "Meet the Press" today, there was some attention to this issue:
CHUCK TODD: [Conyers] took advantage of a situation where he had a - the rules of Congress and I know you guys want to change these rules, but he got to hide his settlement, he got to - his accusers had to go through all sorts of craziness, so why is he entitled to new due process in this case?That's some mind-numbing babble from Pelosi! Keep up the pressure to break those nondisclosure agreements! We the taxpayers were left out of the loop as these secret, self-serving agreements were made. Protect the victim's privacy, sure, but shine a light on the machinations of the members.
REP. NANCY PELOSI: No, I I - we are talking about what we have heard. I’ve asked the Ethics Committee to review that. He has said he’d be open - he will cooperate with any review....
CHUCK TODD: Will you support Congress retroactively making public all of these private settlements that taxpayer dollars have been used?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Not necessarily. Sometimes the victim does not want that to happen.
CHUCK TODD: But if the victim wants it public, will you side with the victim?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: What I have-- yes. But what I--
CHUCK TODD: 100%?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Well, here's the thing. It's really important. Because there is a question as to whether the Ethics Committee can get testimony if you have signed a nondisclosure agreement. We're saying we think the Ethics Committee can, but if you don't agree, we'll pass a law that says the Ethics Committee can, a resolution in Congress that the Ethics Committee can.... But there's no-- I don't want anybody thinking there's any challenge here to our changing the law and see how people-- when we know more about the individual cases. Well, because you know what our biggest strength is? Due process that protects the rights of the victim, so that, whatever the outcome is, everybody knows that there was due process....
Loading...
The NYT reports.
“After careful consideration and in light of the attention drawn by recent allegations made against me,” Mr. Conyers said in a statement on Sunday, he is stepping aside on the Judiciary panel “during the investigation of these matters.... “I deny these allegations, many of which were raised by documents reportedly paid for by a partisan alt-right blogger,” Mr. Conyers said in the statement. “I very much look forward to vindicating myself and my family before the House Committee on Ethics.”...What's important — beyond the Conyers resignation — is changing the procedures in Congress and disclosing the suppressed settlements that taxpayer money funded. On "Meet the Press" today, there was some attention to this issue:
CHUCK TODD: [Conyers] took advantage of a situation where he had a - the rules of Congress and I know you guys want to change these rules, but he got to hide his settlement, he got to - his accusers had to go through all sorts of craziness, so why is he entitled to new due process in this case?That's some mind-numbing babble from Pelosi! Keep up the pressure to break those nondisclosure agreements! We the taxpayers were left out of the loop as these secret, self-serving agreements were made. Protect the victim's privacy, sure, but shine a light on the machinations of the members.
REP. NANCY PELOSI: No, I I - we are talking about what we have heard. I’ve asked the Ethics Committee to review that. He has said he’d be open - he will cooperate with any review....
CHUCK TODD: Will you support Congress retroactively making public all of these private settlements that taxpayer dollars have been used?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Not necessarily. Sometimes the victim does not want that to happen.
CHUCK TODD: But if the victim wants it public, will you side with the victim?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: What I have-- yes. But what I--
CHUCK TODD: 100%?
REP. NANCY PELOSI: Well, here's the thing. It's really important. Because there is a question as to whether the Ethics Committee can get testimony if you have signed a nondisclosure agreement. We're saying we think the Ethics Committee can, but if you don't agree, we'll pass a law that says the Ethics Committee can, a resolution in Congress that the Ethics Committee can.... But there's no-- I don't want anybody thinking there's any challenge here to our changing the law and see how people-- when we know more about the individual cases. Well, because you know what our biggest strength is? Due process that protects the rights of the victim, so that, whatever the outcome is, everybody knows that there was due process....
Thus articles "John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry."
that is all articles "John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/11/john-conyers-steps-aside-from-judiciary.html
0 Response to ""John Conyers Steps Aside From Judiciary Post Amid Sex Harassment Inquiry.""
Post a Comment