Loading...

The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand. - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand.
link : The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand.

The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand.

I'm reading "Did Elizabeth Warren Just Call Her Fellow Senator a Slut?" (by Tyler O'Neil at Pajamas Media) because it was linked by Glenn Reynolds in a post that says "And yesterday [Warren] was 'slut-shaming' fellow Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand."

O'Neil is talking about Warren's response to a Trump tweet...

Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!

... which I blogged about here. I said a few things about what Trump was doing with that tweet, but I ended with:

Trump is toying with sexual innuendo. The woman is "USED!" and she "begg[ed]" and "would do anything."

So it didn't surprise me when, later, I saw that Elizabeth Warren tweeted (in response to Trump's tweet):

Are you really trying to bully, intimidate and slut-shame @SenGillibrand? Do you know who you're picking a fight with? Good luck with that, @realDonaldTrump. Nevertheless, #shepersisted. https://t.co/mYJtBZfxiu

That's not Warren slut-shaming Gillibrand. That's Warren seeing the same thing I saw, I believe. I said "toying with" where she used the device of asking a question, and I said "sexual innuendo" where she said "slut-shaming." It's the same point.

O'Neil concedes that Trump's language "does seem sexually suggestive," which I think gets him as far as agreeing with me. So what's different about how Warren put it? O'Neil says the term "slut-shaming" is a way to criticize someone who's "blaming the victim of sexual assault" because she acting or dressing a certain way, so that would mean that Warren implied that Gillibrand must have been overtly manifesting sexuality and that it was wrong of Trump to react to her expressiveness in a negative way. I think that's what O'Neil is groping at. I'm trying to help O'Neil make sense even as I think that O'Neil does not make sense and that whatever shred of sense is used at the price of looking as though he'd just do anything to attack Elizabeth Warren.

I'm reading "Did Elizabeth Warren Just Call Her Fellow Senator a Slut?" (by Tyler O'Neil at Pajamas Media) because it was linked by Glenn Reynolds in a post that says "And yesterday [Warren] was 'slut-shaming' fellow Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand."

O'Neil is talking about Warren's response to a Trump tweet...

Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!

... which I blogged about here. I said a few things about what Trump was doing with that tweet, but I ended with:

Trump is toying with sexual innuendo. The woman is "USED!" and she "begg[ed]" and "would do anything."

So it didn't surprise me when, later, I saw that Elizabeth Warren tweeted (in response to Trump's tweet):

Are you really trying to bully, intimidate and slut-shame @SenGillibrand? Do you know who you're picking a fight with? Good luck with that,

Loading...

@realDonaldTrump. Nevertheless, #shepersisted. https://t.co/mYJtBZfxiu That's not Warren slut-shaming Gillibrand. That's Warren seeing the same thing I saw, I believe. I said "toying with" where she used the device of asking a question, and I said "sexual innuendo" where she said "slut-shaming." It's the same point.

O'Neil concedes that Trump's language "does seem sexually suggestive," which I think gets him as far as agreeing with me. So what's different about how Warren put it? O'Neil says the term "slut-shaming" is a way to criticize someone who's "blaming the victim of sexual assault" because she acting or dressing a certain way, so that would mean that Warren implied that Gillibrand must have been overtly manifesting sexuality and that it was wrong of Trump to react to her expressiveness in a negative way. I think that's what O'Neil is groping at. I'm trying to help O'Neil make sense even as I think that O'Neil does not make sense and that whatever shred of sense is used at the price of looking as though he'd just do anything to attack Elizabeth Warren.

Thus articles The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand.

that is all articles The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The delusion that Elizabeth Warren "slut-shamed" Kirsten Gillibrand. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-delusion-that-elizabeth-warren-slut.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: