Loading...

"There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem."

Loading...
"There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem."
link : "There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem."

see also


"There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem."

"It was called 'psychopathological mechanisms' of dissent. During the leadership of General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev, psychiatry was used to disable and remove from society political opponents ('dissidents') who openly expressed beliefs that contradicted the official dogma. The term 'philosophical intoxication,' for instance, was widely applied to the mental disorders diagnosed when people disagreed with the country's Communist leaders and, by referring to the writings of the Founding Fathers of Marxism–Leninism—Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Vladimir Lenin—made them the target of criticism.... The 'anti-Soviet' political behavior of some individuals — being outspoken in their opposition to the authorities, demonstrating for reform, and writing critical books — were defined simultaneously as criminal acts (e.g., a violation of Articles 70 or 190-1), symptoms of mental illness (e.g., 'delusion of reformism'), and susceptible to a ready-made diagnosis (e.g., 'sluggish schizophrenia'). Within the boundaries of the diagnostic category, the symptoms of pessimism, poor social adaptation and conflict with authorities were themselves sufficient for a formal diagnosis of 'sluggish schizophrenia.'... [F]or many Soviet psychiatrists 'sluggish schizophrenia' appeared to be a logical explanation to apply to the behavior of critics of the regime who, in their opposition, seemed willing to jeopardize their happiness, family, and career for a reformist conviction or ideal that was so apparently divergent from the prevailing social and political orthodoxy...."

I'm reading "Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union." Much more at the link.



Photo by Pudelek (Marcin Szala) of a gulag reconstruction in the Museum of the Occupation of Latvia. CC BY-SA 3.0. The museum lighting gives the place — as photographed — a cozy warmth that could not have been present in the real thing.
"It was called 'psychopathological mechanisms' of dissent. During the leadership of General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev, psychiatry was used to disable and remove from society political opponents ('dissidents') who openly expressed beliefs that contradicted the official dogma. The term 'philosophical intoxication,' for instance, was widely applied to the mental disorders diagnosed when people disagreed with the country's Communist leaders and, by referring to the writings of the Founding Fathers of Marxism–Leninism—Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Vladimir Lenin—made them the target of criticism.... The 'anti-Soviet' political behavior of some individuals — being outspoken in their opposition to the authorities, demonstrating for reform, and writing critical books — were defined simultaneously as criminal acts (e.g., a violation of Articles 70 or 190-1), symptoms of mental illness (e.g., 'delusion of reformism'), and susceptible to a ready-made diagnosis (e.g., 'sluggish schizophrenia'). Within the boundaries of the diagnostic category, the symptoms of pessimism, poor social adaptation and conflict with authorities were themselves sufficient for a formal diagnosis of 'sluggish schizophrenia.'... [F]or
Loading...
many Soviet psychiatrists 'sluggish schizophrenia' appeared to be a logical explanation to apply to the behavior of critics of the regime who, in their opposition, seemed willing to jeopardize their happiness, family, and career for a reformist conviction or ideal that was so apparently divergent from the prevailing social and political orthodoxy...."

I'm reading "Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union." Much more at the link.



Photo by Pudelek (Marcin Szala) of a gulag reconstruction in the Museum of the Occupation of Latvia. CC BY-SA 3.0. The museum lighting gives the place — as photographed — a cozy warmth that could not have been present in the real thing.


Thus articles "There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem."

that is all articles "There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/01/there-was-systematic-political-abuse-of.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to ""There was systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, based on the interpretation of political opposition or dissent as a psychiatric problem.""

Post a Comment

Loading...