Loading...
Title : Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts."
link : Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts."
Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts."
See if you can read my mind about why I put "mind-reading" and "facts" in quotation marks.Here's Adams's blog post. Example:
BirtherismThat "factual report" contained mind reading: Trump did what he did "to gain a political advantage." If you're going to strip away the mind-reading, you can't leave traces of mind-reading that skew the so-called "facts" away from the direction where the MSM's mind-reading tries to take us.
Factual Report: Donald Trump exploited doubts within the Republican base about President Obama’s birth certificate to gain a political advantage. This is a common political tactic. Candidate Trump used the same strategy against Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada but is an American citizen.
Mind Reading: We can read Trump’s inner racist mind and we know the real reason he was involved with birtherism is to send a silent dog whistle to the racists in the Republican party.
Other examples at the link are "Some illegal Mexican immigrants are criminals and some are not," "Charlottesville," "KKK Disavowal," "Judge Curiel," and "Shithole Countries."
Adams's point is that "the anti-Trump media created the 'monster' version of Trump based on mind-reading punditry" and, that "Factual reporting would not have created that impression in the public’s mind."
Notice that Adams is reading a mind even more inscrutable than Trump's — "the public's mind."
Is there such a thing? I don't believe in that monster (I assert, but you don't know if I'm lying).
Inside that mythical beast — "the public's mind" — there is a "monster" that Adams purports to see. And Adams even purports to read the public's mind as it would exist if only the news media had not presented the news as if it could read Trump's mind. Adams is the master mind-reader.
I'm sure Adams is already aware of all these insights, because I'm reading his mind.
See if you can read my mind about why I put "mind-reading" and "facts" in quotation marks.
Here's Adams's blog post. Example:
Other examples at the link are "Some illegal Mexican immigrants are criminals and some are
Here's Adams's blog post. Example:
BirtherismThat "factual report" contained mind reading: Trump did what he did "to gain a political advantage." If you're going to strip away the mind-reading, you can't leave traces of mind-reading that skew the so-called "facts" away from the direction where the MSM's mind-reading tries to take us.
Factual Report: Donald Trump exploited doubts within the Republican base about President Obama’s birth certificate to gain a political advantage. This is a common political tactic. Candidate Trump used the same strategy against Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada but is an American citizen.
Mind Reading: We can read Trump’s inner racist mind and we know the real reason he was involved with birtherism is to send a silent dog whistle to the racists in the Republican party.
Other examples at the link are "Some illegal Mexican immigrants are criminals and some are
Loading...
not," "Charlottesville," "KKK Disavowal," "Judge Curiel," and "Shithole Countries."
Adams's point is that "the anti-Trump media created the 'monster' version of Trump based on mind-reading punditry" and, that "Factual reporting would not have created that impression in the public’s mind."
Notice that Adams is reading a mind even more inscrutable than Trump's — "the public's mind."
Is there such a thing? I don't believe in that monster (I assert, but you don't know if I'm lying).
Inside that mythical beast — "the public's mind" — there is a "monster" that Adams purports to see. And Adams even purports to read the public's mind as it would exist if only the news media had not presented the news as if it could read Trump's mind. Adams is the master mind-reader.
I'm sure Adams is already aware of all these insights, because I'm reading his mind.
Adams's point is that "the anti-Trump media created the 'monster' version of Trump based on mind-reading punditry" and, that "Factual reporting would not have created that impression in the public’s mind."
Notice that Adams is reading a mind even more inscrutable than Trump's — "the public's mind."
Is there such a thing? I don't believe in that monster (I assert, but you don't know if I'm lying).
Inside that mythical beast — "the public's mind" — there is a "monster" that Adams purports to see. And Adams even purports to read the public's mind as it would exist if only the news media had not presented the news as if it could read Trump's mind. Adams is the master mind-reader.
I'm sure Adams is already aware of all these insights, because I'm reading his mind.
Thus articles Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts."
that is all articles Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/02/scott-adams-imagines-what-news-would-be.html
0 Response to "Scott Adams imagines what the news would be like if it stopped "mind-reading" and reported only "facts.""
Post a Comment