Loading...

Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous
link : Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous

Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous

Richard Fernandez, PJ Media: Hybrid Warfare is Dangerous

The death by airstrike of a large number of Russian "mercenary troops" allegedly attacking a US backed position in Syria is reminder that hybrid/proxy/low-intensity conflict is not without risk. The New York Times described the scale of the incident. "Aleksandr Ionov, a Russian businessman working in Syria offering security and other services ... estimated after conversations with associates in several private military organizations that more than 200 Russians might have been killed. ... not all those killed were Russian: Some of the paid fighters came from other countries that were once part of the Soviet Union."

That is the equivalent of a whole infantry company gone.

Read more ....

WNU Editor: The above post is by Richard Fernandez .... always worth a read. The above video is Michael Weiss from the Daily Beast giving his take on the recent US airstrike on Russian mercenaries, the situation in Syria, and what this airstrike could mean for US-Russia relations.

Update: Stephen Green from Instapundit is correct in this analysis ....

.... The two big advantages of using sub-state actors are plausible deniability and giving state actors pause before — or if — they take any action against them. On the flip side, when a state actor gives the go-ahead and dozens of your mercenaries get blown up, you can’t exactly get in a big diplomatic (or military) huff about it.

Richard Fernandez, PJ Media: Hybrid Warfare is Dangerous

The death by airstrike of a large number of Russian "mercenary troops" allegedly attacking a US backed position in Syria is reminder that hybrid/proxy/low-intensity conflict is not without risk. The New York Times described the scale of the incident. "Aleksandr Ionov, a Russian businessman working in Syria offering security and other services ... estimated after conversations with associates in several private military organizations that more than 200 Russians might have been killed. ... not all those killed were Russian: Some of the paid fighters came from other countries that were once part of the Soviet Union."

That is the equivalent of a whole infantry company gone.

Loading...

href="https://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/hybrid-warfare-dangerous/">Read more ....

WNU Editor: The above post is by Richard Fernandez .... always worth a read. The above video is Michael Weiss from the Daily Beast giving his take on the recent US airstrike on Russian mercenaries, the situation in Syria, and what this airstrike could mean for US-Russia relations.

Update: Stephen Green from Instapundit is correct in this analysis ....

.... The two big advantages of using sub-state actors are plausible deniability and giving state actors pause before — or if — they take any action against them. On the flip side, when a state actor gives the go-ahead and dozens of your mercenaries get blown up, you can’t exactly get in a big diplomatic (or military) huff about it.

Thus articles Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous

that is all articles Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Why Russia's Hybrid War In Syria Is Dangerous with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/02/why-russias-hybrid-war-in-syria-is.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: