Loading...
Title : A Review Of The F-35
link : A Review Of The F-35
A Review Of The F-35
F-35. Flickr
Dan Grazier, National Interest: F-35: Is America's Most Expensive Weapon of War the Ultimate Failure?
Jim Roche, then-Secretary of the Air Force, made an announcement on October 26, 2001, that all aviation enthusiasts had been waiting for: a winner had been picked to design and build the Joint Strike Fighter. The American people were assured the new jet would enter service in 2008 and be a high-performance replacement for the military’s aging airframes while only costing between $40 million and $50 million.
The F-35 has now entered an unprecedented seventeenth year of continuing redesign, test deficiencies, fixes, schedule slippages, and cost overruns. And it’s still not at the finish line. Numerous missteps along the way—from the fact that the two competing contractors, Lockheed Martin and Boeing, submitted “flyoff” planes that were crude and undeveloped “technology demonstrators” rather than following the better practice of submitting fully functional prototypes, to concurrent acquisition malpractice that has prevented design flaws from being discovered until after production models were built—have led to where we are now.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: A comprehensive look at the F-35 program (Hint: It is not pretty).
Loading...
F-35. Flickr
Dan Grazier, National Interest: F-35: Is America's Most Expensive Weapon of War the Ultimate Failure?
Jim Roche, then-Secretary of the Air Force, made an announcement on October 26, 2001, that all aviation enthusiasts had been waiting for: a winner had been picked to design and build the Joint Strike Fighter. The American people were assured the new jet would enter service in 2008 and be a high-performance replacement for the military’s aging airframes while only costing between $40 million and $50 million.
The F-35 has now entered an unprecedented seventeenth year of continuing redesign, test deficiencies, fixes, schedule slippages, and cost overruns. And it’s still not at the finish line. Numerous missteps along the way—from the fact that the two competing contractors, Lockheed Martin and Boeing, submitted “flyoff” planes that were crude and undeveloped “technology demonstrators” rather than following the better practice of submitting fully functional prototypes, to concurrent acquisition malpractice that has prevented design flaws from being discovered until after production models were built—have led to where we are now.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: A comprehensive look at the F-35 program (Hint: It is not pretty).
Thus articles A Review Of The F-35
that is all articles A Review Of The F-35 This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article A Review Of The F-35 with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/03/a-review-of-f-35.html
0 Response to "A Review Of The F-35"
Post a Comment