Loading...
Title : I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides."
link : I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides."
I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides."
I knew it was hype/fake, but I was overcome by curiosity about the details. Don't do that! I hate to compound the error of clicking by linking, but I will. It's Axios.The "stunning leak" was the information that Trump was advised not to congratulate Putin on his election victory. The leak went to the Washington Post, which published what to me is a nonstory: "Trump’s national security advisers warned him not to congratulate Putin. He did it anyway."
Axios seems to have a leak about the leak:
The speed and sensitivity of the leak prompted immediate finger-pointing within the administration, as aides reeled from a leak that could only have come from a small group of people, each of whom is trusted with sensitive national secrets....Are they really reeling or do they just want to create the factoid that Trump did it on his own? In which case it's not really a leak at all. For all I know, Trump himself divulged that his aides told him not to congratulate Putin... and maybe that was a lie. This is why I consider it a nonstory. The whole thing is a phantom.
Loading...
I knew it was hype/fake, but I was overcome by curiosity about the details. Don't do that! I hate to compound the error of clicking by linking, but I will. It's Axios.
The "stunning leak" was the information that Trump was advised not to congratulate Putin on his election victory. The leak went to the Washington Post, which published what to me is a nonstory: "Trump’s national security advisers warned him not to congratulate Putin. He did it anyway."
Axios seems to have a leak about the leak:
The "stunning leak" was the information that Trump was advised not to congratulate Putin on his election victory. The leak went to the Washington Post, which published what to me is a nonstory: "Trump’s national security advisers warned him not to congratulate Putin. He did it anyway."
Axios seems to have a leak about the leak:
The speed and sensitivity of the leak prompted immediate finger-pointing within the administration, as aides reeled from a leak that could only have come from a small group of people, each of whom is trusted with sensitive national secrets....Are they really reeling or do they just want to create the factoid that Trump did it on his own? In which case it's not really a leak at all. For all I know, Trump himself divulged that his aides told him not to congratulate Putin... and maybe that was a lie. This is why I consider it a nonstory. The whole thing is a phantom.
Thus articles I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides."
that is all articles I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/03/i-vehemently-disapprove-of-myself-for.html
0 Response to "I vehemently disapprove of myself for clicking on "A stunning leak rattles Trump and his aides.""
Post a Comment