Loading...

"Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

Loading...
"Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."
link : "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

see also


"Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

John Nichols, writing at The Nation, says "Scott Walker Is Trying To Dismantle Democracy in Wisconsin."
This legally-dubious attempt to overturn a judge’s order by writing a new law would radically alter rules that have been in place for decades—and in some cases more than a century—for holding prompt special elections. Yet, Republican legislative leaders plan to call an extraordinary special session April 4 to pass the legislation, and Walker says he will sign it immediately. Then, if the special elections have been called by the governor in order to a contempt of court ruling, Walker allies suggest, the governor will then cancel them....
What's the legal argument that the legislature can't change the statutory law after a court has interpreted it and said that it must be followed? It's not enough to just say "legally-dubious." What's the argument? It can't be that it would "radically alter rules that have been in place for decades" — legislation can change existing law even when the law is old. I can see saying you like the old law better and are arguing that it's a good container of the value "democracy," but — speaking of democracy — if the legislature has the votes to change the law, it can change it.

And "dismantle democracy" is awfully melodramatic. We have way too many election days in Wisconsin, and I think they produce low turnout, which means that fewer people get to decide. For example, we need to notice that next Tuesday is an election day. It's annoying to non-politicos to be rousted to the polls so frequently, but for those who do take the trouble, our votes have extra weight. Is that democratic?
Loading...
John Nichols, writing at The Nation, says "Scott Walker Is Trying To Dismantle Democracy in Wisconsin."
This legally-dubious attempt to overturn a judge’s order by writing a new law would radically alter rules that have been in place for decades—and in some cases more than a century—for holding prompt special elections. Yet, Republican legislative leaders plan to call an extraordinary special session April 4 to pass the legislation, and Walker says he will sign it immediately. Then, if the special elections have been called by the governor in order to a contempt of court ruling, Walker allies suggest, the governor will then cancel them....
What's the legal argument that the legislature can't change the statutory law after a court has interpreted it and said that it must be followed? It's not enough to just say "legally-dubious." What's the argument? It can't be that it would "radically alter rules that have been in place for decades" — legislation can change existing law even when the law is old. I can see saying you like the old law better and are arguing that it's a good container of the value "democracy," but — speaking of democracy — if the legislature has the votes to change the law, it can change it.

And "dismantle democracy" is awfully melodramatic. We have way too many election days in Wisconsin, and I think they produce low turnout, which means that fewer people get to decide. For example, we need to notice that next Tuesday is an election day. It's annoying to non-politicos to be rousted to the polls so frequently, but for those who do take the trouble, our votes have extra weight. Is that democratic?


Thus articles "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year."

that is all articles "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/03/instead-of-following-order-to-call.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""Instead of following an order to call special elections to fill vacant legislative seats, the governor wants a new law that says they can be left empty for a year.""

Post a Comment

Loading...