Loading...

Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to."
link : Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to."

Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to."

I'm following the live blog at SCOTUSblog.

UPDATE 1: The first case is Abbot v. Perez, a 5-4 decision about racial gerrymandering in Texas:

ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a concurring opinion,in which GORSUCH,J.,joined. SOTOMAYOR,J.,filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and KAGAN, JJ., joined.

From Alito's majority opinion:

It was the challengers’ burden to show that the 2013 Legislature acted with discriminatory intent when it enacted plans that the court itself had produced. The 2013 Legislature was not obligated to show that it had “cured” the unlawful intent that the court attributed to the 2011 Legislature. Thus, the essential pillar of the three-judge court’s reasoning was critically flawed.

When the congressional and state legislative districts are reviewed under the proper legal standards, all but one of them, we conclude, are lawful.

I'm following the live blog at SCOTUSblog.

UPDATE 1: The first case is Abbot v. Perez, a 5-4 decision about racial gerrymandering in Texas:

ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a concurring opinion,in which GORSUCH,J.,joined. SOTOMAYOR,J.,filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and KAGAN, JJ., joined.

From Alito's majority opinion:

It was the challengers’ burden to show that the 2013

Loading...

Legislature acted with discriminatory intent when it enacted plans that the court itself had produced. The 2013 Legislature was not obligated to show that it had “cured” the unlawful intent that the court attributed to the 2011 Legislature. Thus, the essential pillar of the three-judge court’s reasoning was critically flawed.

When the congressional and state legislative districts are reviewed under the proper legal standards, all but one of them, we conclude, are lawful.

Thus articles Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to."

that is all articles Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Big day in the Supreme Court — "the last scheduled day, but they could easily add another day if they wanted to." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/06/big-day-in-supreme-court-last-scheduled.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: