Loading...

"Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."
link : "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

"Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

"Thus, if your personality tends toward unsociability, you shouldn’t feel the need to change.... [A]s long as you have regular social contact, you are choosing solitude rather than being forced into it, you have at least a few good friends and your solitude is good for your well-being or productivity... feel free to de-clutter your social calendar. It’s psychologist-approved."

From "Why being a loner may be good for your health/We tend to decry being alone. But emerging research suggests some potential benefits to being a loner – including for our creativity, mental health and even leadership skills" (BBC).

Those are some onerous conditions after "[A]s long as" and before you can "feel free." I'm not really seeing a robust justification of "being a loner." If you're really the loner type, do you "have regular social contact" and "at least a few good friends"? "A few" in my book means more than 2, and "good friends" seems like a pretty high standard, as if you need substantially more than 3 friends to be psychologist-approved to "de-clutter your social calendar." Even that phrase "de-clutter your social calendar" seems ridiculous. It assumes you've got lots of social options and you just want to be free to decline some of them. This isn't a real loner we're talking about. It seems to be about people who take on far more social connection than than necessary and have had trouble admitting is crowding out something else that they'd prefer.

Loading...

"Thus, if your personality tends toward unsociability, you shouldn’t feel the need to change.... [A]s long as you have regular social contact, you are choosing solitude rather than being forced into it, you have at least a few good friends and your solitude is good for your well-being or productivity... feel free to de-clutter your social calendar. It’s psychologist-approved."

From "Why being a loner may be good for your health/We tend to decry being alone. But emerging research suggests some potential benefits to being a loner – including for our creativity, mental health and even leadership skills" (BBC).

Those are some onerous conditions after "[A]s long as" and before you can "feel free." I'm not really seeing a robust justification of "being a loner." If you're really the loner type, do you "have regular social contact" and "at least a few good friends"? "A few" in my book means more than 2, and "good friends" seems like a pretty high standard, as if you need substantially more than 3 friends to be psychologist-approved to "de-clutter your social calendar." Even that phrase "de-clutter your social calendar" seems ridiculous. It assumes you've got lots of social options and you just want to be free to decline some of them. This isn't a real loner we're talking about. It seems to be about people who take on far more social connection than than necessary and have had trouble admitting is crowding out something else that they'd prefer.

Thus articles "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you."

that is all articles "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Nurturing a few solid relationships without feeling the need to constantly populate your life with chattering voices ultimately may be better for you." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/08/nurturing-few-solid-relationships.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: