Loading...
Title : TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT
link : TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT
TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT
One of these names is not like the others:* Ollie NorthAnyone remember this from a few months ago?
* Clarence Thomas
* Brett Kavanaugh
* Peter Strzok
That was an angry, fiery, self-righteous monologue in a high-profile congressional hearing. But unlike Ollie North's Iran-contra testimony, Clarence Thomas's "high-tech lynching" monologue, and Brett Kavanaugh's enraged weepfest on Thursday, Strzok's testimony wasn't a game-changer -- he lost his FBI job and the president is still gunning for the Mueller investigation.
When I watched Strzok in the summer, I assumed he was consciously echoing the strategy of North. But this works only if what you're saying jibes with the political interests of the GOP, the party of male rage. If you are, you can pound your chest in a congressional hearing and be acclaimed a hero based on content and style. But if you're challenging the GOP, forget it -- righteous anger won't help you.
One of these names is not like the others:
That was an angry, fiery, self-righteous monologue in a high-profile congressional hearing. But unlike Ollie North's Iran-contra testimony, Clarence Thomas's "high-tech lynching" monologue, and Brett
* Ollie NorthAnyone remember this from a few months ago?
* Clarence Thomas
* Brett Kavanaugh
* Peter Strzok
That was an angry, fiery, self-righteous monologue in a high-profile congressional hearing. But unlike Ollie North's Iran-contra testimony, Clarence Thomas's "high-tech lynching" monologue, and Brett
Loading...
Kavanaugh's enraged weepfest on Thursday, Strzok's testimony wasn't a game-changer -- he lost his FBI job and the president is still gunning for the Mueller investigation.
When I watched Strzok in the summer, I assumed he was consciously echoing the strategy of North. But this works only if what you're saying jibes with the political interests of the GOP, the party of male rage. If you are, you can pound your chest in a congressional hearing and be acclaimed a hero based on content and style. But if you're challenging the GOP, forget it -- righteous anger won't help you.
When I watched Strzok in the summer, I assumed he was consciously echoing the strategy of North. But this works only if what you're saying jibes with the political interests of the GOP, the party of male rage. If you are, you can pound your chest in a congressional hearing and be acclaimed a hero based on content and style. But if you're challenging the GOP, forget it -- righteous anger won't help you.
Thus articles TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT
that is all articles TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/09/testimony-diatribes-are-effective-only.html
0 Response to "TESTIMONY DIATRIBES ARE EFFECTIVE ONLY IF YOU'RE BACKED BY THE RIGHT"
Post a Comment