Loading...
Title : A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings.
link : A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings.
A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings.
I'm reading "The Kavanaugh confirmation polarized women, and motivated them to vote — some for Republicans, some for Democrats" by Jin Woo Kim in The Washington Post.I recruited about 4,600 U.S. residents through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. (Amazon.com founder and chief executive Jeffrey P. Bezos owns The Washington Post.)...Hmm.
MTurk respondents are not representative of the U.S. population. To ensure that the findings were not driven by the younger and more well-educated people who tend to be overrepresented in the MTurk platform, I checked...I won't copy the explanation of how he checked.
... Republican women supported the court more after Kavanaugh’s confirmation by nine percentage points, while Democratic women mistrusted it more by 11 percentage points. As a result, the gap between Republican and Democratic women increased from 15 to 34 points....
Because Republican and Democratic women’s views of the court changed by about the same amount in opposite directions, the average gender gap in views about the court remained roughly the same.
In short, Kavanaugh’s confirmation was indeed polarizing, as many predicted. But the most pronounced polarization was not between men and women, but between Republican women and non-Republican women.
Loading...
I'm reading "The Kavanaugh confirmation polarized women, and motivated them to vote — some for Republicans, some for Democrats" by Jin Woo Kim in The Washington Post.
I recruited about 4,600 U.S. residents through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. (Amazon.com founder and chief executive Jeffrey P. Bezos owns The Washington Post.)...Hmm.
MTurk respondents are not representative of the U.S. population. To ensure that the findings were not driven by the younger and more well-educated people who tend to be overrepresented in the MTurk platform, I checked...I won't copy the explanation of how he checked.
... Republican women supported the court more after Kavanaugh’s confirmation by nine percentage points, while Democratic women mistrusted it more by 11 percentage points. As a result, the gap between Republican and Democratic women increased from 15 to 34 points....
Because Republican and Democratic women’s views of the court changed by about the same amount in opposite directions, the average gender gap in views about the court remained roughly the same.
In short, Kavanaugh’s confirmation was indeed polarizing, as many predicted. But the most pronounced polarization was not between men and women, but between Republican women and non-Republican women.
Thus articles A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings.
that is all articles A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2018/10/a-postdoctoral-researcher-at-dartmouth.html
0 Response to "A postdoctoral researcher at Dartmouth College’s Program in Quantitative Social Science quanitifes the gender polarization from the Kavanaugh hearings."
Post a Comment