Loading...

The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee

Loading...
The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee
link : The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee

see also


The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee

Wait long enough, and great ideas come back around, although not necessarily wearing the same garb.  Elizabeth Warren has just come out for a 2% wealth tax (above $50 million).*  But this is simply an annualized version of my lump sum stochastic jubilee.  What’s the advantage of redistributing the whole thing every 50 years (on average) vs a steady trickle?  A periodic reset would interrupt long run processes of wealth inequality more fully than a tax, so long as the rate of return on financial assets is high enough to compensate for the extra annual pinch, which it most likely would be, since wealth holders would demand a higher rate of return.  It would also be a lot more fun.  On the other hand, it would be more complicated to administer and might be resisted by force.

On balance, I’d go for the jubilee, but I’ll take Warren’s version as a close second.

*There’s also an extra 1% on wealth in excess of $1 billion, but this is largely symbolic.
Loading...
Wait long enough, and great ideas come back around, although not necessarily wearing the same garb.  Elizabeth Warren has just come out for a 2% wealth tax (above $50 million).*  But this is simply an annualized version of my lump sum stochastic jubilee.  What’s the advantage of redistributing the whole thing every 50 years (on average) vs a steady trickle?  A periodic reset would interrupt long run processes of wealth inequality more fully than a tax, so long as the rate of return on financial assets is high enough to compensate for the extra annual pinch, which it most likely would be, since wealth holders would demand a higher rate of return.  It would also be a lot more fun.  On the other hand, it would be more complicated to administer and might be resisted by force.

On balance, I’d go for the jubilee, but I’ll take Warren’s version as a close second.

*There’s also an extra 1% on wealth in excess of $1 billion, but this is largely symbolic.


Thus articles The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee

that is all articles The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-two-percent-solution-warren-and.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "The Two Percent Solution: Warren and the Stochastic Jubilee"

Post a Comment

Loading...