Loading...
Title : "The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts...."
link : "The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts...."
"The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts...."
"It is a fact that in October 2016 the FBI wiretapped Carter Page, who had earlier been a short-term foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign. The bureau's application to a secret court for that wiretapping is public. It is heavily redacted but is clearly focused on Page and 'the Russian government's attempt to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.' Page was wiretapped because of his connection with the Trump campaign. Some critics have noted that the wiretap authorization came after Page left the campaign. But the surveillance order allowed authorities to intercept Page's electronic communications both going forward from the day of the order and backward, as well. Investigators could see Page's emails and texts going back to his time in the campaign. So there is simply no doubt that the FBI wiretapped a Trump campaign figure.... [I]t is also known that the FBI engaged at least one informant, a professor named Stefan Halper, to penetrate the Trump campaign... [D]espite the cries from outraged Democrats and the media analysts who simply can't imagine what Barr might have been referring to, the attorney general's words were demonstrably true."Writes Byron York at The Washington Times.
"It is a fact that in October 2016 the FBI wiretapped Carter Page, who had earlier been a short-term foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign. The bureau's application to a secret court for that wiretapping is public. It is heavily redacted but is clearly focused on Page and 'the Russian government's attempt to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.' Page was wiretapped because of his connection with the Trump campaign. Some critics have noted that the wiretap authorization came after Page left the campaign. But the surveillance order allowed authorities to intercept Page's electronic communications both going forward from the day of the order and backward, as well. Investigators could see Page's emails and texts going back to his time in the campaign. So there is
Loading...
simply no doubt that the FBI wiretapped a Trump campaign figure.... [I]t is also known that the FBI engaged at least one informant, a professor named Stefan Halper, to penetrate the Trump campaign... [D]espite the cries from outraged Democrats and the media analysts who simply can't imagine what Barr might have been referring to, the attorney general's words were demonstrably true."
Writes Byron York at The Washington Times.
Writes Byron York at The Washington Times.
Thus articles "The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts...."
that is all articles "The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts...." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts...." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-baffling-thing-was-why-they-were.html
0 Response to ""The baffling thing was why they were baffled. Barr's statement was accurate and supported by publicly known facts....""
Post a Comment