Loading...
Title : Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds.
link : Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds.
Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds.
I stand by the constitutional (not moral) argument I offered in my controversial oped: if a 16 year old has the constitutional right to have an abortion without state or parental interference, how could she not have the constitutional right to engage in consensual sex? 1/ https://t.co/48Thb8Uaym— Alan Dershowitz (@AlanDersh) July 29, 2019
The thread at Twitter continues. Dershowitz goes on to say:
I challenge my readers to distinguish the cases, as a matter of constitutional law. I did not suggest that it is moral to have sex with a 16 year old, but rather that the issue presents a constitutional conundrum worthy of discussion. 2/And:
I also pointed out that, statutory rape laws are applied quite selectively and often against young teenagers. That’s why I also say there are Romeo and Juliet exceptions. Lets debate not name call. End/He's taunted by tweeters who say things like:
OK, perv.And:
Could this be because you raped a 16 year old?But I'm going to take his question about abortion seriously. And here are my questions: When woman under the age of consent seeks an abortion, it is always the case that she is the victim of statutory rape, is it not? If statutory rape is a serious crime — as Dershowitz's taunters apparently believe — shouldn't the abortion providers always report the crime to the police? Providing an abortion to an underage woman and doing nothing about the sexual abuse is covering up a crime, isn't it?
I stand by the constitutional (not moral) argument I offered in my controversial oped: if a 16 year old has the constitutional right to have an abortion without state or parental interference, how could she not have the constitutional right to engage in consensual sex? 1/ https://t.co/48Thb8Uaym— Alan Dershowitz (@AlanDersh) July 29, 2019
The thread at Twitter continues. Dershowitz goes on to say:
I challenge my readers to distinguish the cases, as a matter of constitutional law. I did not suggest that it is moral to have sex with a 16 year old, but rather that the issue presents a constitutional conundrum worthy of discussion. 2/And:
I also pointed out that, statutory rape
Loading...
laws are applied quite selectively and often against young teenagers. That’s why I also say there are Romeo and Juliet exceptions. Lets debate not name call. End/
He's taunted by tweeters who say things like:
OK, perv.And:
Could this be because you raped a 16 year old?But I'm going to take his question about abortion seriously. And here are my questions: When woman under the age of consent seeks an abortion, it is always the case that she is the victim of statutory rape, is it not? If statutory rape is a serious crime — as Dershowitz's taunters apparently believe — shouldn't the abortion providers always report the crime to the police? Providing an abortion to an underage woman and doing nothing about the sexual abuse is covering up a crime, isn't it?
Thus articles Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds.
that is all articles Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2019/07/alan-dershowitz-asks-tricky-question.html
0 Response to "Alan Dershowitz asks a tricky question about 16 year olds."
Post a Comment