Loading...
Title : "For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa..."
link : "For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa..."
"For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa..."
Says the NYT, in "What’s at Stake in the New Hampshire Primary/Here are the candidates competing in the primary."I just want to say:
1. 2004 was not that long ago.
2. What do you mean "after Iowa"? We never got to "after Iowa."
3. Maybe that's why we never got to after Iowa — The Democratic Party needed to keep everyone in, so the results were withheld, lest somebody drop out.
Says the NYT, in "What’s at Stake in the New Hampshire Primary/Here are the candidates competing in the primary."
I just want to say:
1. 2004 was not that long ago.
2. What do you mean "after Iowa"? We never
I just want to say:
1. 2004 was not that long ago.
2. What do you mean "after Iowa"? We never
Loading...
got to "after Iowa."
3. Maybe that's why we never got to after Iowa — The Democratic Party needed to keep everyone in, so the results were withheld, lest somebody drop out.
3. Maybe that's why we never got to after Iowa — The Democratic Party needed to keep everyone in, so the results were withheld, lest somebody drop out.
Thus articles "For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa..."
that is all articles "For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa..." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2020/02/for-first-time-since-2004-nobody.html
0 Response to ""For the first time since 2004, nobody dropped out after Iowa...""
Post a Comment