"There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."
link : "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

"There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

"The president and his administration have placed an outsize burden of blame on antifa, without waiting for arrest data and completed investigations. This is not the first time Trump has pointed to antifa as a shadowy nemesis. But the misinformation created by his continued insistence of antifa’s involvement has led to more chaos and violence in an already turbulent moment. As always, the burden of proof rests with the speaker — and the administration has provided no evidence, only assertions that it has evidence. Trump earns Four Pinocchios."

Write Meg Kelly and Elyse Samuels at the Washington Post "Fact Checker," addressing the many statements by Trump that the Black Lives Matter protests involve antifa.

This, by the way, was also the problem the NYT had with the Tom Cotton op-ed. As I said when the NYT first expressed regret for publishing the piece:

A particular problem with Cotton's piece was that it said "left-wing radicals like antifa infiltrating protest marches to exploit Floyd’s death for their own anarchic purposes," but the NYT has not yet reported that the violent element was antifa. Its news story on June 1 had said "conservative commentators are asserting with little evidence that antifa, the far-left anti-fascism activist movement coordinates the riots and looting."

Whether Cotton was right or wrong about the facts, there is a problem with factual assertions in op-eds. I've written op-eds for the NYT, and it was with a very short deadline and I was trusted to get the facts in order. I don't know how much the Times intends to change its process, but I assume it wants and needs to have some distance between itself and the writers it brings in from the outside to give a hot take on a breaking controversial story.

I added: "Why isn't there more reporting in the NYT about who's responsible for the violence and disorder accompanying the protests?"

I'm mildly glad to see the WaPo Fact Checker addressing this topic, but it's pathetic that this basic level of journalistic inquiry is coming so late. It is, however, horrible that Trump (and Cotton) have spread this meme. Maybe they are right and the Fact Checker is wrong, but it's not enough to luck out in the end and have said something that turns out to be the truth. We should care about the truth for the sake of truth and care about it all along. There's so little of that these days.

A particular problem with Cotton's piece was that it said "left-wing radicals like antifa infiltrating protest marches to exploit Floyd’s death for their own anarchic purposes," but the NYT has not yet reported that the violent element was antifa. Its news story on June 1 had said "conservative commentators are asserting with little evidence that antifa, the far-left anti-fascism activist movement coordinates the riots and looting."

Whether Cotton was right or wrong about the facts, there is a problem with factual assertions in op-eds. I've written op-eds for the NYT, and it was with a very short deadline and I was trusted to get the facts in order. I don't know how much the Times intends to change its process, but I assume it wants and needs to have some distance between itself and the writers it brings in from the outside to give a hot take on a breaking controversial story.

Thus articles "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

that is all articles "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2020/06/there-has-not-yet-been-single-confirmed.html

"There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

"There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

Thus articles "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

0 Response to ""There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country.""

Post a Comment

"There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

see also

"There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

Thus articles "There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country."

0 Response to ""There has not yet been a single confirmed case in which someone who self-identifies as antifa led violent acts at any of the protests across the country.""

Post a Comment