Loading...
Title : "The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world..."
link : "The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world..."
"The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world..."
"... not an externalized world, but under the world, the warm interiority of the world, a compressed internalized world. Whence the prodigious sexual success of women: possessing a woman is possessing the world."Wrote Gilles Deleuze, quoted in "To Fascinate and Unnerve/The philosophical leftovers of Gilles Deleuze" at The Nation.
I just thought I'd drop in over at The Nation to see what was going on. I do that now and then, maybe once a week at most. That "Fascinate and Unnerve" business seemed more promising that the other headlines I saw. For example: "The Deaths of 150,000 Americans Are on Trump’s Hands/Trump and his lackeys are guilty of criminal negligence, if not far worse. Who will hold them accountable?" Such evil pot-stirring.
But that Deleuze is something. Decades ago, one used to encounter so many statements like that, presented as impressively intellectual. They're funny now. I'd say the challenge is: What are we taking seriously that will be plainly ridiculous in 50 years?
"... not an externalized world, but under the world, the warm interiority of the world, a compressed internalized world. Whence the prodigious sexual success of women: possessing a woman is possessing the world."
Wrote Gilles Deleuze, quoted in "To Fascinate and Unnerve/The philosophical leftovers of Gilles Deleuze" at The Nation.
I just thought I'd drop in over at The Nation to see what was going on. I do that now and then, maybe once a week at most. That "Fascinate and Unnerve" business seemed more promising that the other headlines I saw. For example:
Wrote Gilles Deleuze, quoted in "To Fascinate and Unnerve/The philosophical leftovers of Gilles Deleuze" at The Nation.
I just thought I'd drop in over at The Nation to see what was going on. I do that now and then, maybe once a week at most. That "Fascinate and Unnerve" business seemed more promising that the other headlines I saw. For example:
Loading...
href="https://www.thenation.com/article/society/coronavirus-trump-crimes/">"The Deaths of 150,000 Americans Are on Trump’s Hands/Trump and his lackeys are guilty of criminal negligence, if not far worse. Who will hold them accountable?" Such evil pot-stirring.
But that Deleuze is something. Decades ago, one used to encounter so many statements like that, presented as impressively intellectual. They're funny now. I'd say the challenge is: What are we taking seriously that will be plainly ridiculous in 50 years?
But that Deleuze is something. Decades ago, one used to encounter so many statements like that, presented as impressively intellectual. They're funny now. I'd say the challenge is: What are we taking seriously that will be plainly ridiculous in 50 years?
Thus articles "The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world..."
that is all articles "The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world..." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2020/08/the-body-of-woman-is-overwhelming.html
0 Response to ""The body of the woman is the overwhelming triumph of flesh. The woman is a concrete universal; she is a world...""
Post a Comment