Loading...

"How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?" - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?"
link : "How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?"

"How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?"

Question answered at the ACLU website. 

First, the technology itself can be racially biased.... Buolamwini and Gebru’s 2018 research concluded that some facial analysis algorithms misclassified Black women nearly 35 percent of the time, while nearly always getting it right for white men.... These error-prone, racially biased algorithms can have devastating impacts for people of color.... 

Second, police in many jurisdictions in the U.S. use mugshot databases to identify people with face recognition algorithms....  Across the U.S., Black people face arrest for a variety of crimes at far higher rates than white people. Take cannabis arrests, for just one example... 

Third... the entire system is racist.... Surveillance of Black people in the U.S. has a pernicious and largely unaddressed history, beginning during the antebellum era.... [There is] spying that targets political speech, too often conflated with “terrorism,” and spying that targets people suspected of drug or gang involvement. In recent years, we learned of an FBI surveillance program targeting so-called “Black Identity Extremists,” which appears to be the bureau’s way of justifying domestic terrorism investigations of Black Lives Matter activists.... Racial disparities in the government’s war on drugs are well documented.

I was reading that because of this vote in my city last night: "Madison City Council bans city agencies from using facial recognition technology" (Wisconsin State Journal).

On a 17-2 vote, the council approved a new ordinance that prohibits city agencies, departments and divisions from using facial recognition technology or "information derived from a face surveillance system" with a handful of exceptions. Following a national reckoning this year on over-policing in communities of color, Madison and other governments have scrutinized and limited the use of face surveillance systems by law enforcement. 

"The technology has proven to be unreliable and faulty," Ald. Rebecca Kemble, 18th District, said of facial recognition, describing the ban more as a moratorium. "We also don't want this technology to be used to further worsen the racial disparities that there already are in our criminal justice system."

Question answered at the ACLU website. 

First, the technology itself can be racially biased.... Buolamwini and Gebru’s 2018 research concluded that some facial analysis algorithms misclassified Black women nearly 35 percent of the time, while nearly always getting it right for white men.... These error-prone, racially biased algorithms can have devastating impacts for people of color.... 

Second, police in many jurisdictions in the U.S. use mugshot databases to identify people with face recognition algorithms....  Across the U.S., Black people face arrest for a variety of crimes at far higher rates than white people. Take cannabis arrests, for just one example... 

Third... the entire system is racist.... Surveillance of Black people in the U.S. has a pernicious and largely unaddressed history, beginning during the antebellum era.... [There is] spying that targets political speech, too often conflated with “terrorism,” and spying that targets people suspected of drug or gang involvement. In recent years, we learned of an FBI surveillance program targeting so-called “Black Identity Extremists,” which appears to be the bureau’s way of justifying domestic terrorism investigations of Black Lives Matter activists.... Racial disparities in the government’s war on drugs are well

Loading...

documented.

I was reading that because of this vote in my city last night: "Madison City Council bans city agencies from using facial recognition technology" (Wisconsin State Journal).

On a 17-2 vote, the council approved a new ordinance that prohibits city agencies, departments and divisions from using facial recognition technology or "information derived from a face surveillance system" with a handful of exceptions. Following a national reckoning this year on over-policing in communities of color, Madison and other governments have scrutinized and limited the use of face surveillance systems by law enforcement. 

"The technology has proven to be unreliable and faulty," Ald. Rebecca Kemble, 18th District, said of facial recognition, describing the ban more as a moratorium. "We also don't want this technology to be used to further worsen the racial disparities that there already are in our criminal justice system."

Thus articles "How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?"

that is all articles "How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?" This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "How is Face Recognition Surveillance Technology Racist?... How is face surveillance an anti-Black technology?" with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2020/12/how-is-face-recognition-surveillance.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: