Loading...
Title : "Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste."
link : "Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste."
"Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste."
"In sixteenth-century France, amid religious moralizing and the pervasive fear of witchcraft, the scent of a woman’s undercarriage, once considered an ambrosial ideal, became synonymous with the occult. The stigma was worse for aging women, who became seen as olfactory ogres; Muchembled quotes the poet Joachim du Bellay’s disgust at an 'old woman older than the world / older yet than squalid filth.' Our own experience confirms that smells are subject not just to major cultural changes but also to minor shifts in context: the same smell that greets you at the door of a cheesemonger has a very different effect when confronted at the door of a porta-potty."From "How to Make Sense of Scents/Can language ever capture the mysterious world of smells?" by Rachel Syme (in The New Yorker)(discussing "Smells: A Cultural History of Odours in Early Modern Times" by Robert Muchembled).
Loading...
"In sixteenth-century France, amid religious moralizing and the pervasive fear of witchcraft, the scent of a woman’s undercarriage, once considered an ambrosial ideal, became synonymous with the occult. The stigma was worse for aging women, who became seen as olfactory ogres; Muchembled quotes the poet Joachim du Bellay’s disgust at an 'old woman older than the world / older yet than squalid filth.' Our own experience confirms that smells are subject not just to major cultural changes but also to minor shifts in context: the same smell that greets you at the door of a cheesemonger has a very different effect when confronted at the door of a porta-potty."
From "How to Make Sense of Scents/Can language ever capture the mysterious world of smells?" by Rachel Syme (in The New Yorker)(discussing "Smells: A Cultural History of Odours in Early Modern Times" by Robert Muchembled).
Thus articles "Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste."
that is all articles "Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/01/smell-can-never-truly-be-understood.html
0 Response to ""Smell can never truly be understood through science, Muchembled argues, because it is always vulnerable to the whims of popular taste.""
Post a Comment