Loading...

Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?

Loading...
Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)? - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?
link : Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?

see also


Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?

Even vaccinating 100 percent of the population with Pfizer's 95% effective shot (green) would leave the transmission rate of the 'super-covid' variant from the UK above zero, while less effective shots like Oxford's (red and blue) would fail to drive the R number below 1, at which point the pandemic would be considered 'stable' 


 * Higher transmission rate of the UK 'super-covid' variant could drive up the number of people who need to be vaccinated in order for a population to reach herd immunity 
 * US health officials say between 75% and 90% of the population need to be vaccinated for US herd immunity 
 * Vaccines are not 100% effective, so a more infectious variant could spread more quickly from people who got a less effective shot that did not work 
 * University of East Anglia researchers estimate that the new UK variant raises the R number, or transmission rate by about 56% 
 * At that rate, 80% of the US population needs to get Moderna's or Pfizer's shot for the pandmeic to be stable 
 * But even vaccinating 100% of the population, including kids, would not drive transmission down to zero 
 * Vaccinating even 100% of the population with Oxford's 70% effective shot could not drive transmission of the new variant that is already dominant there down to one - the 'stable' threshold 
 * Only 5.2% of the US population has gotten a first dose of coronavirus vaccine; President Biden aims for 100 million vaccinations in 100 days 

Even vaccinating 100 percent of the population may not be enough to eradicate COVID-19 once 'super-covid' variants become dominant in the US, a new study suggests. 

The emergence of more infectious variants means that each new case could lead to a greater number of additional cases. 

As a result, vaccines - even the most effective ones - may not be able to outpace the rate of transmission. 

Read more .... 

WNU Editor: I am confident that with time this pandemic will burn itself out. But the above post outlines a nightmare scenario that we all better hope does not happen.
Loading...
Even vaccinating 100 percent of the population with Pfizer's 95% effective shot (green) would leave the transmission rate of the 'super-covid' variant from the UK above zero, while less effective shots like Oxford's (red and blue) would fail to drive the R number below 1, at which point the pandemic would be considered 'stable' 


 * Higher transmission rate of the UK 'super-covid' variant could drive up the number of people who need to be vaccinated in order for a population to reach herd immunity 
 * US health officials say between 75% and 90% of the population need to be vaccinated for US herd immunity 
 * Vaccines are not 100% effective, so a more infectious variant could spread more quickly from people who got a less effective shot that did not work 
 * University of East Anglia researchers estimate that the new UK variant raises the R number, or transmission rate by about 56% 
 * At that rate, 80% of the US population needs to get Moderna's or Pfizer's shot for the pandmeic to be stable 
 * But even vaccinating 100% of the population, including kids, would not drive transmission down to zero 
 * Vaccinating even 100% of the population with Oxford's 70% effective shot could not drive transmission of the new variant that is already dominant there down to one - the 'stable' threshold 
 * Only 5.2% of the US population has gotten a first dose of coronavirus vaccine; President Biden aims for 100 million vaccinations in 100 days 

Even vaccinating 100 percent of the population may not be enough to eradicate COVID-19 once 'super-covid' variants become dominant in the US, a new study suggests. 

The emergence of more infectious variants means that each new case could lead to a greater number of additional cases. 

As a result, vaccines - even the most effective ones - may not be able to outpace the rate of transmission. 

Read more .... 

WNU Editor: I am confident that with time this pandemic will burn itself out. But the above post outlines a nightmare scenario that we all better hope does not happen.


Thus articles Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?

that is all articles Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)? with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/01/will-highly-infectious-super-covid.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Will Highly Infectious 'Super-Covid' Variants Result In The Pandemic Being With Us For Years (Even With Vaccines)?"

Post a Comment

Loading...