Loading...
Title : "Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups..."
link : "Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups..."
"Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups..."
"... elevating it in the stream of material it served to users. Giving priority to Groups, Facebook said, would help people make meaningful connections with like-minded friends. The shift came as Facebook faced criticism that News Feed was susceptible to foreign interference and other manipulation.... In a 2020 Super Bowl ad, it celebrated amateur-rocketry buffs, bouldering clubs and rocking-chair enthusiasts—brought together through Groups. Nina Jankowicz, a social media researcher at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., said she became alarmed after hearing a Facebook representative advise a European prime minister’s social-media director that Groups were now the best way to reach a large audience on the platform. 'My eyes bugged out of my head,' said Ms. Jankowicz, who studies the intersection of democracy and technology. 'I knew how destructive Groups could be.' The problem, she said, was that Facebook wasn’t stepping up oversight along with its algorithmic promotion of Groups. Recommendations could take a user from an alternative-health Group to an anti-Covid-lockdown Group to a militia Group in a few clicks.... If Facebook didn’t rethink its approach, she warned, Groups could undermine democracy.... Many of the most successful Groups were under the control of administrators that tolerated or actively cultivated hate speech, harassment and graphic calls for violence, it said, noting that one top Group 'aggregates the most inflammatory news stories of the day and feeds them to a vile crowd that immediately and repeatedly calls for violence.'"From "Facebook Knew Calls for Violence Plagued ‘Groups,’ Now Plans Overhaul/The giant struggled to balance Mark Zuckerberg’s free-expression mantra against findings that rabid partisanship had overrun a feature central to its future" (Wall Street Journal, where I got in without a subscription).
Much as I deplore violence and worry about terrible people organizing quickly, when I read "aggregates the most inflammatory news stories of the day and feeds them to a vile crowd," I thought: Oh, no, that's what my ex-friends say about me!
Loading...
"... elevating it in the stream of material it served to users. Giving priority to Groups, Facebook said, would help people make meaningful connections with like-minded friends. The shift came as Facebook faced criticism that News Feed was susceptible to foreign interference and other manipulation.... In a 2020 Super Bowl ad, it celebrated amateur-rocketry buffs, bouldering clubs and rocking-chair enthusiasts—brought together through Groups. Nina Jankowicz, a social media researcher at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C., said she became alarmed after hearing a Facebook representative advise a European prime minister’s social-media director that Groups were now the best way to reach a large audience on the platform. 'My eyes bugged out of my head,' said Ms. Jankowicz, who studies the intersection of democracy and technology. 'I knew how destructive Groups could be.' The problem, she said, was that Facebook wasn’t stepping up oversight along with its algorithmic promotion of Groups. Recommendations could take a user from an alternative-health Group to an anti-Covid-lockdown Group to a militia Group in a few clicks.... If Facebook didn’t rethink its approach, she warned, Groups could undermine democracy.... Many of the most successful Groups were under the control of administrators that tolerated or actively cultivated hate speech, harassment and graphic calls for violence, it said, noting that one top Group 'aggregates the most inflammatory news stories of the day and feeds them to a vile crowd that immediately and repeatedly calls for violence.'"
From "Facebook Knew Calls for Violence Plagued ‘Groups,’ Now Plans Overhaul/The giant struggled to balance Mark Zuckerberg’s free-expression mantra against findings that rabid partisanship had overrun a feature central to its future" (Wall Street Journal, where I got in without a subscription).
Much as I deplore violence and worry about terrible people organizing quickly, when I read "aggregates the most inflammatory news stories of the day and feeds them to a vile crowd," I thought: Oh, no, that's what my ex-friends say about me!
Thus articles "Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups..."
that is all articles "Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups..." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/02/facebooks-2019-renovations-marked.html
0 Response to ""Facebook’s 2019 renovations marked a strategic pivot away from its News Feed and one of its most significant platform alterations in years. It emphasized content from Groups...""
Post a Comment