Title : "I’m nowhere near as crazed as I was. It’s a lot easier now. I feel like I can hear the thoughts in my own head again."
link : "I’m nowhere near as crazed as I was. It’s a lot easier now. I feel like I can hear the thoughts in my own head again."
"I’m nowhere near as crazed as I was. It’s a lot easier now. I feel like I can hear the thoughts in my own head again."
Said NYT reporter Maggie Haberman, answering the question how her days have changed now that Trump isn't President anymore.
Quoted in "Maggie Haberman on life after Trump and the one question she regrets not asking" (Forward).
The question she regrets not asking isn't really one question but a line of inquiry:
One question that I think is sort of an open one is he has said very little about what he expected the federal government to be like when he came in. Remember, you are talking about somebody who was never in government before, and we forget how strange that is — that we had a president who had never won an election before and never served at any level before. His understanding of what government was going to be, I believe, was very different than the way the federal government actually works.
She had 4 years. Why did she never get around to it? I have to suspect that she didn't want to get inside his head and see things from his point of view and with empathy. What if his understanding of "what government was going to be" had value? He was coming in from the outside, with all his observations and powers — what could he offer? Why assume it was all bad and "the way the federal government actually works" right now is the way it should be? Ironically, it's the very definition of conservatism to believe that the working system already in operation is the way it is for good reason and ideas about transforming it are dangerous.
Said NYT reporter Maggie Haberman, answering the question how her days have changed now that Trump isn't President anymore.
Quoted in "Maggie Haberman on life after Trump and the one question she regrets not asking" (Forward).
The question she regrets not asking isn't really one question but a line of inquiry:
One question that I think is sort of an open one is he has said very little about what he expected the federal government to be like when he came in. Remember, you are talking about somebody who was never in government before, and we forget how strange that is — that we had a president who had never won an election before and never served at any level before. His understanding of what government was going to be, I believe, was very different than the way the federal government actually works.
She had 4 years. Why did she never get around to it? I have to suspect that she didn't want to get inside his head and see things from his point of view and with empathy. What if his understanding of "what government was going to be" had value? He was coming in from the outside, with all his observations and powers — what could he offer? Why assume it was all bad and "the way the federal government actually works" right now is the way it should be? Ironically, it's the very definition of conservatism to believe that the working system already in operation is the way it is for good reason and ideas about transforming it are dangerous.
Thus articles "I’m nowhere near as crazed as I was. It’s a lot easier now. I feel like I can hear the thoughts in my own head again."
You now read the article "I’m nowhere near as crazed as I was. It’s a lot easier now. I feel like I can hear the thoughts in my own head again." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/03/im-nowhere-near-as-crazed-as-i-was-its.html
0 Response to ""I’m nowhere near as crazed as I was. It’s a lot easier now. I feel like I can hear the thoughts in my own head again.""
Post a Comment