Loading...

"For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..."

Loading...
"For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone...", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..."
link : "For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..."

see also


"For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..."

"... and it was 'one size fits all.' But those swim caps left out large groups of swimmers, adding to structural inequities that often keep people of color out of the pool. Many swimmers have celebrated recent advances in swim cap technology. Several brands... have introduced options with more flexible material that vary in size, accommodating swimmers with hair that is larger and more textured than their White competitors’...  [T]he International Swimming Federation...  said the design does not fit 'the natural form of the head.' To the best of their knowledge, they added, 'the athletes competing at the international events never used, neither require … caps of such size and configuration.'"

From "Swim caps for natural hair are banned from the Olympics. Black women hear a clear message: ‘You don’t belong.’ The International Swimming Federation said the design does not fit ‘the natural form of the head’" (WaPo). 

I expect this decision to be reversed. It's not as though the enlarged crown of these hats gives the swimmer an advantage. It must be a disadvantage, increasing drag. 

Loading...

"... and it was 'one size fits all.' But those swim caps left out large groups of swimmers, adding to structural inequities that often keep people of color out of the pool. Many swimmers have celebrated recent advances in swim cap technology. Several brands... have introduced options with more flexible material that vary in size, accommodating swimmers with hair that is larger and more textured than their White competitors’...  [T]he International Swimming Federation...  said the design does not fit 'the natural form of the head.' To the best of their knowledge, they added, 'the athletes competing at the international events never used, neither require … caps of such size and configuration.'"

From "Swim caps for natural hair are banned from the Olympics. Black women hear a clear message: ‘You don’t belong.’ The International Swimming Federation said the design does not fit ‘the natural form of the head’" (WaPo). 

I expect this decision to be reversed. It's not as though the enlarged crown of these hats gives the swimmer an advantage. It must be a disadvantage, increasing drag. 



Thus articles "For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..."

that is all articles "For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone..." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/07/for-many-years-there-was-one-kind-of.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""For many years, there was one kind of swim cap. It was ultratight, made of latex or silicone...""

Post a Comment

Loading...