Loading...

"The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash."
link : "The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash."

"The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash."

"Name changing helps the pilgrims envision entering a new world. The pilgrims also underwent a public confession around midnight, during which each person listed all their past and present sexual relationships. The names were then publicly read around the bonfire; the intention was to let go of the past. Each of the relationships was tied as a knot on individual palm branches. The branches were then burned in the fire."

From "Inside a Peyote Pilgrimage/Drug tourists, mining companies and farming encroachment are threatening the Wixárika people’s annual hunt for the psychedelic plant in the Mexican desert" (NYT). 

From the comments: 

The premise of the article is that drug tourists are threatening the abundance and stability of this fragile ecosystem and the indigenous sacred practices that belong there. Got it. So the NYTimes sends a writer and photographer who microdose and tell the reader exactly where the peyote fields are. Cue the stampede for the Burning Man crowd. I’m just wondering if there were any discussions in the editorial office about the ethics of this piece?

Loading...

"Name changing helps the pilgrims envision entering a new world. The pilgrims also underwent a public confession around midnight, during which each person listed all their past and present sexual relationships. The names were then publicly read around the bonfire; the intention was to let go of the past. Each of the relationships was tied as a knot on individual palm branches. The branches were then burned in the fire."

From "Inside a Peyote Pilgrimage/Drug tourists, mining companies and farming encroachment are threatening the Wixárika people’s annual hunt for the psychedelic plant in the Mexican desert" (NYT). 

From the comments: 

The premise of the article is that drug tourists are threatening the abundance and stability of this fragile ecosystem and the indigenous sacred practices that belong there. Got it. So the NYTimes sends a writer and photographer who microdose and tell the reader exactly where the peyote fields are. Cue the stampede for the Burning Man crowd. I’m just wondering if there were any discussions in the editorial office about the ethics of this piece?

Thus articles "The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash."

that is all articles "The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "The evening’s first ritual was a name-changing ceremony: The desert became the ocean; peyote became chayote squash." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-evenings-first-ritual-was-name.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: