Loading...
Title : A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge.
link : A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge.
A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge.
Alan Braid explains why in The Washington Post:Newly graduated from the University of Texas medical school, I began my obstetrics and gynecology residency at a San Antonio hospital on July 1, 1972.... At the hospital that year, I saw three teenagers die from illegal abortions. One I will never forget. When she came into the ER, her vaginal cavity was packed with rags. She died a few days later from massive organ failure, caused by a septic infection....
For me, it is 1972 all over again. And that is why, on the morning of Sept. 6, I provided an abortion to a woman who, though still in her first trimester, was beyond the state’s new limit. I acted because I had a duty of care to this patient, as I do for all patients, and because she has a fundamental right to receive this care.
I fully understood that there could be legal consequences — but I wanted to make sure that Texas didn’t get away with its bid to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested....
Since [the new law went into effect], most of our patients have been too far along in their pregnancies to qualify for abortion care. I tell them that we can offer services only if we cannot see the presence of cardiac activity on an ultrasound, which usually occurs at about six weeks, before most people know they are pregnant.
The tension is unbearable as they lie there, waiting to hear their fate. If we detect cardiac activity, we have to refer them out of state. One of the women I talked with since the law took effect is 42. She has four kids, three under 12. I advised her that she could go to Oklahoma. That’s a nine-hour drive one way. I explained we could help with the funding.
She told me she couldn’t go even if we flew her in a private jet. “Who’s going to take care of my kids?” she asked me. “What about my job? I can’t miss work.”
I understand that by providing an abortion beyond the new legal limit, I am taking a personal risk, but it’s something I believe in strongly. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, my clinics are among the plaintiffs in an ongoing federal lawsuit to stop S.B. 8.... I have spent the past 50 years treating and helping patients. I can’t just sit back and watch us return to 1972.
I'm giving this my "lawsuits I hope will succeed" tag because the doctor is associated with one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit designed to stop the new law. Should he become the defendant in one of these citizen suits to enforce the law, he'll have an opportunity to assert the constitutional right as a defense, and I hope that defense will succeed.
His having performed the abortion in violation of the law should help with the standing problem in federal court. He now has a threatened injury that is concrete and particular.
Loading...
Alan Braid explains why in The Washington Post:
Newly graduated from the University of Texas medical school, I began my obstetrics and gynecology residency at a San Antonio hospital on July 1, 1972.... At the hospital that year, I saw three teenagers die from illegal abortions. One I will never forget. When she came into the ER, her vaginal cavity was packed with rags. She died a few days later from massive organ failure, caused by a septic infection....
For me, it is 1972 all over again. And that is why, on the morning of Sept. 6, I provided an abortion to a woman who, though still in her first trimester, was beyond the state’s new limit. I acted because I had a duty of care to this patient, as I do for all patients, and because she has a fundamental right to receive this care.
I fully understood that there could be legal consequences — but I wanted to make sure that Texas didn’t get away with its bid to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested....
Since [the new law went into effect], most of our patients have been too far along in their pregnancies to qualify for abortion care. I tell them that we can offer services only if we cannot see the presence of cardiac activity on an ultrasound, which usually occurs at about six weeks, before most people know they are pregnant.
The tension is unbearable as they lie there, waiting to hear their fate. If we detect cardiac activity, we have to refer them out of state. One of the women I talked with since the law took effect is 42. She has four kids, three under 12. I advised her that she could go to Oklahoma. That’s a nine-hour drive one way. I explained we could help with the funding.
She told me she couldn’t go even if we flew her in a private jet. “Who’s going to take care of my kids?” she asked me. “What about my job? I can’t miss work.”
I understand that by providing an abortion beyond the new legal limit, I am taking a personal risk, but it’s something I believe in strongly. Represented by the Center for Reproductive Rights, my clinics are among the plaintiffs in an ongoing federal lawsuit to stop S.B. 8.... I have spent the past 50 years treating and helping patients. I can’t just sit back and watch us return to 1972.
I'm giving this my "lawsuits I hope will succeed" tag because the doctor is associated with one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit designed to stop the new law. Should he become the defendant in one of these citizen suits to enforce the law, he'll have an opportunity to assert the constitutional right as a defense, and I hope that defense will succeed.
His having performed the abortion in violation of the law should help with the standing problem in federal court. He now has a threatened injury that is concrete and particular.
Thus articles A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge.
that is all articles A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/09/a-physician-in-texas-has-violated-new.html
0 Response to "A physician in Texas has violated the new abortion law and he wants his action to be public knowledge."
Post a Comment