Title : "My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks."
link : "My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks."
"My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks."
That's funny — intentionally funny, I presume — because "this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks" is just what a partisan hack would say, and "My goal today is to convince you that" is just the intro that an elite partisan hack would use to butter up an elite audience.
The quote is from "Justice Amy Coney Barrett argues Supreme Court isn't 'a bunch of partisan hacks'" (USA Today).
I'm not calling Barrett a partisan hack. I just want to say that these speeches are so unnewsworthy. Supreme Court Justices always say the same thing — they're not partisans, not political. Justice Breyer is out and about these days — he's got another book — and he's saying the same thing. They need to say it, and I understand why. It's central to their legitimacy. But it's an assertion that they are not abusing their power. What's the good of saying it over and over? You're getting into "protests too much" territory.
By the way, I remember when educated people made a point of using "comprise" correctly. Is that over? Is it the new "nauseous" — a word you can only use wrongly or people won't get what you mean?
That's funny — intentionally funny, I presume — because "this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks" is just what a partisan hack would say, and "My goal today is to convince you that" is just the intro that an elite partisan hack would use to butter up an elite audience.
The quote is from "Justice Amy Coney Barrett argues Supreme Court isn't 'a bunch of partisan hacks'" (USA Today).
I'm not calling Barrett a partisan hack. I just want to say that these speeches are so unnewsworthy. Supreme Court Justices always say the same thing — they're not partisans, not political. Justice Breyer is out and about these days — he's got another book — and he's saying the same thing. They need to say it, and I understand why. It's central to their legitimacy. But it's an assertion that they are not abusing their power. What's the good of saying it over and over? You're getting into "protests too much" territory.
By the way, I remember when educated people made a point of using "comprise" correctly. Is that over? Is it the new "nauseous" — a word you can only use wrongly or people won't get what you mean?
Thus articles "My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks."
You now read the article "My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/09/my-goal-today-is-to-convince-you-that.html
0 Response to ""My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks.""
Post a Comment