Loading...

We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?

Loading...
We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change? - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?
link : We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?

see also


We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?

I'm trying to read "We Need to Start Traveling Again. Here’s How" by Tony Blair, John Bell, and David B. Agus (NYT).

The piece is all about documenting vaccinations worldwide, and the assumption that people should be encouraged to travel is a given.

We're barraged with articles about climate change, full of demands that we cut back on all sorts of things, but here we are, already traveling much less. Why don't we assume that's a good thing — a wonderful accomplishment — and speak only of restraining ourselves from getting back to the pre-pandemic practice of blithely jetting about the planet?

I'm glad to see that the comments at the NYT are full of this opinion: "With climate change increasingly being shown to be an existential threat, we should NOT be trying to "jump start" any additional travel whatsoever. It's time to set priorities, and then act like they are a priorities. I know the argument for more travel is related to the economy, as always. The earth cannot support economic growth forever," "Unleashing worldwide travel is exactly the wrong idea in the era of Climate Crisis. The argument that travel is essential to healthy economies is similarly wrong headed. The cost of forever climate emergencies is incalculable by today’s standards," "My immediate reaction to the headline - confirmed in the essay - is that this is completely wrong-headed. Less travel is a good thing, not a bad thing - good for the planet, good for individuals. Yes it is hard on places that depend on tourism ... but eliminating coal-fired plants is hard on places that depend on coal mining. Some necessary travel will resume and some pleasure travel will resume, but if there is less, it will be good for the world as a whole," etc. etc.
Loading...
I'm trying to read "We Need to Start Traveling Again. Here’s How" by Tony Blair, John Bell, and David B. Agus (NYT).

The piece is all about documenting vaccinations worldwide, and the assumption that people should be encouraged to travel is a given.

We're barraged with articles about climate change, full of demands that we cut back on all sorts of things, but here we are, already traveling much less. Why don't we assume that's a good thing — a wonderful accomplishment — and speak only of restraining ourselves from getting back to the pre-pandemic practice of blithely jetting about the planet?

I'm glad to see that the comments at the NYT are full of this opinion: "With climate change increasingly being shown to be an existential threat, we should NOT be trying to "jump start" any additional travel whatsoever. It's time to set priorities, and then act like they are a priorities. I know the argument for more travel is related to the economy, as always. The earth cannot support economic growth forever," "Unleashing worldwide travel is exactly the wrong idea in the era of Climate Crisis. The argument that travel is essential to healthy economies is similarly wrong headed. The cost of forever climate emergencies is incalculable by today’s standards," "My immediate reaction to the headline - confirmed in the essay - is that this is completely wrong-headed. Less travel is a good thing, not a bad thing - good for the planet, good for individuals. Yes it is hard on places that depend on tourism ... but eliminating coal-fired plants is hard on places that depend on coal mining. Some necessary travel will resume and some pleasure travel will resume, but if there is less, it will be good for the world as a whole," etc. etc.


Thus articles We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?

that is all articles We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change? with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/09/we-need-to-start-traveling-again-why.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "We need to start traveling again? Why, exactly... and why don't you even mention climate change?"

Post a Comment

Loading...