Loading...

"But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States."
link : "But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States."

"But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States."

"In interviews last week, several advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and to the Food and Drug Administration said data show that, with the exception of adults over age 65, the vast majority of Americans are already well protected against severe illness and do not need booster shots. All the advisers felt that they were obligated to make difficult choices, based on sparse research, in the middle of a public health emergency. But some said they felt compelled to vote for the shots because of the way the federal agencies framed the questions that they were asked to consider. Other committee experts said that they wanted to avoid confusing the public further by dissenting, or that they voted according to their views of the evidence and were simply overruled."

 
From "Are Vaccine Boosters Widely Needed? Some Federal Advisers Have Misgivings/'In our hearts, I think people don’t quite agree with this notion of a booster dose,' said one leading vaccine expert" (NYT).

In straining to maintain authority, the experts undermine their authority. There is too much pressure to present a united front and to give one clear message to people. It's practical, but only short-term practical. When we see that scientists don't stay true to science, we will regard them as part of a propaganda machine. In the future, we won't listen. I wonder how bad did it get before the NYT decided it needed to publish this article. There's been so much fear about saying anything disruptive about vaccines.

Loading...

"In interviews last week, several advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and to the Food and Drug Administration said data show that, with the exception of adults over age 65, the vast majority of Americans are already well protected against severe illness and do not need booster shots. All the advisers felt that they were obligated to make difficult choices, based on sparse research, in the middle of a public health emergency. But some said they felt compelled to vote for the shots because of the way the federal agencies framed the questions that they were asked to consider. Other committee experts said that they wanted to avoid confusing the public further by dissenting, or that they voted according to their views of the evidence and were simply overruled."

 
From "Are Vaccine Boosters Widely Needed? Some Federal Advisers Have Misgivings/'In our hearts, I think people don’t quite agree with this notion of a booster dose,' said one leading vaccine expert" (NYT).

In straining to maintain authority, the experts undermine their authority. There is too much pressure to present a united front and to give one clear message to people. It's practical, but only short-term practical. When we see that scientists don't stay true to science, we will regard them as part of a propaganda machine. In the future, we won't listen. I wonder how bad did it get before the NYT decided it needed to publish this article. There's been so much fear about saying anything disruptive about vaccines.

Thus articles "But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States."

that is all articles "But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "But the recommendations — even those approved unanimously — mask significant dissent and disquiet among those advisers about the need for booster shots in the United States." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/10/but-recommendations-even-those-approved.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: