Title : US Debates Promising A "No First Use" Of Nuclear Weapons
link : US Debates Promising A "No First Use" Of Nuclear Weapons
US Debates Promising A "No First Use" Of Nuclear Weapons
“A legally-binding no-first-use commitment—through congressional legislation or a multilateral treaty—would make a nuclear first-strike order illegal, drawing a clear line for US military officers.” @jmsleight in @BulletinAtomic https://t.co/8FweByyONe
— Global Zero (@globalzero) October 6, 2021
Defense News: Debate on ‘no first use’ of nukes mushrooms in Washington
WASHINGTON ― Five years after President Barack Obama turned back from declaring a “no first use” as U.S. policy for nuclear weapons, opponents say the Biden administration is considering it too, and warn that it risks alienating allies.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s ranking member, Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, said that he believes America’s allies are “very, very upset” with the idea President Joe Biden might reverse decades of U.S. nuclear policy as part of his administration’s sweeping Nuclear Posture Review, expected in 2022.
The U.S. has historically maintained ambiguity about whether it would carry out a first strike with a nuclear weapon, but the policy would expressly rule it out.
Read more ....
Update: US Debates Promising No First Use of Nukes (Antiwar.com)
WNU Editor: This is not the first time the US is debating a "no first use".
My prediction.
This change in US nuclear policy is not going to happen.
“A legally-binding no-first-use commitment—through congressional legislation or a multilateral treaty—would make a nuclear first-strike order illegal, drawing a clear line for US military officers.” @jmsleight in @BulletinAtomic https://t.co/8FweByyONe
— Global Zero (@globalzero) October 6, 2021
Defense News: Debate on ‘no first use’ of nukes mushrooms in Washington
WASHINGTON ― Five years after President Barack Obama turned back from declaring a “no first use” as U.S. policy for nuclear weapons, opponents say the Biden administration is considering it too, and warn that it risks alienating allies.
The Senate Foreign
The U.S. has historically maintained ambiguity about whether it would carry out a first strike with a nuclear weapon, but the policy would expressly rule it out.
Read more ....
Update: US Debates Promising No First Use of Nukes (Antiwar.com)
WNU Editor: This is not the first time the US is debating a "no first use".
My prediction.
This change in US nuclear policy is not going to happen.
Thus articles US Debates Promising A "No First Use" Of Nuclear Weapons
You now read the article US Debates Promising A "No First Use" Of Nuclear Weapons with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2021/10/us-debates-promising-no-first-use-of.html
Related Posts :
"What surgeons continually emphasizedthe implanters with pride the explanters with dismaywas that most of the men they were seeing had been of at least average size..."
Leading by example.- Have I written about this topic too many times? Oh but I must be entitled to have another go at it.
- "They wanted Russians to fight each other. They rubbed their hands dreaming of taking revenge for their failures at the front and during the so-called counteroffensive. But they miscalculated."
- Tiny travel: going for a walk.
0 Response to "US Debates Promising A "No First Use" Of Nuclear Weapons"
Post a Comment