Loading...

The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question. - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question.
link : The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question.

The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question.

More, here, at the Miami Herald. Miami-Dade County has sent the owners a property tax bill of nearly $120,000, but there's a state constitutional law provision barring property tax on boats. What makes a boat? The lawyer for the owners says the county is relying on "the shape and the style and the look" of what the lawyer calls "this boat."

This isn't just an isolated case. This thing — "The Arkup" — has been touted in mainstream media and is intended as a model for extensive new housing development — "small apartments on the water for students, townhouses for families.... housing solutions for a broader audience." I can see why the promoters of this kind of floating house-building stress future benefits for the non-rich, but the real house/boat in issue in this case belongs to rich people.

Who should pay property taxes? Why should land-based domicile-owners pay the bills? Should you have to change that state constitutional law provision first, or is it enough for the government to draw the boat/house distinction in the way that allows for more tax collection?

But houseboats have been around for ages, so you'd think this problem would have been worked out long ago.

More, here, at the Miami Herald. Miami-Dade County has sent the owners a property tax bill of nearly $120,000, but there's a state constitutional law provision barring property tax on boats. What makes a boat? The lawyer for the owners says the county is relying on "the shape and the style and the look" of what the lawyer calls "this boat."

This isn't just an isolated case. This thing — "The Arkup" — has been touted in mainstream media and is

Loading...

intended as a model for extensive new housing development — "small apartments on the water for students, townhouses for families.... housing solutions for a broader audience." I can see why the promoters of this kind of floating house-building stress future benefits for the non-rich, but the real house/boat in issue in this case belongs to rich people.

Who should pay property taxes? Why should land-based domicile-owners pay the bills? Should you have to change that state constitutional law provision first, or is it enough for the government to draw the boat/house distinction in the way that allows for more tax collection?

But houseboats have been around for ages, so you'd think this problem would have been worked out long ago.

Thus articles The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question.

that is all articles The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The house/yacht distinction — it's a tax question. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2022/04/the-houseyacht-distinction-its-tax.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: