Loading...

"The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one."
link : "The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one."

"The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one."

"While breaking bread together has its benefits, only dining with others means you’re missing out on one of the greatest joys of travel — eating alone at a restaurant. This is especially true while traveling, when it is easy to get immersed in a semi-predictable dialogue at the dinner table. There’s the rehashing of the day’s events, discussing details of tomorrow’s itinerary and lamenting how sore your feet are from walking on cobblestones. This isn’t a diss to your companion(s); it’s just the realities of traveling with someone else. Eating by yourself provides an opportunity to hone in on details as they happen — all in real time. You will be more likely to notice the intricate font on the menu or the server’s delicate placement of the bread basket on the table...."

Writes Chris Dong in "Dining solo is one of the great joys of traveling/No offense to your travel companions, but they’re holding you back from a culinary journey" (WaPo).

Most articles about dining alone are about dealing with the predicament of being alone and wanting or needing to eat in a restaurant. But this article has you contemplating an actual preference for being alone while you are with someone else.

It reminds me of that old LSD experiment where the doctor asks the subject — who seems to be having a sublime experience — "Is it all one," and she says "It would be all one if you weren't here." 

But isn't this always the problem with the company of others? Your baseline is how you feel when you're alone, which ought to be just fine. Who is a good enough companion to be better than no one? If you're anxious about being alone, your baseline is too low, and you may end up in conversations that displace superior uses of your consciousness. 

One problem with dining alone is that you might end up wasting your precious consciousness on thoughts about whether solo diners displease the restaurant personnel or whether other people are thinking about how pathetic you are.

"While breaking bread together has its benefits, only dining with others means you’re missing out on one of the greatest joys of travel — eating alone at a restaurant. This is especially true while traveling, when it is easy to get immersed in a semi-predictable dialogue at the dinner table. There’s the rehashing of the day’s events, discussing details of tomorrow’s itinerary and lamenting how sore your feet are from walking on cobblestones. This isn’t a diss to your companion(s); it’s just the realities of traveling with someone else. Eating by yourself provides an opportunity to hone in on details as they happen — all in real time. You will be more likely to notice the intricate font on the menu or the server’s delicate placement of the bread basket on the table...."

Writes Chris Dong in "Dining solo is one of the great joys of traveling/No offense to your travel companions, but they’re holding you back from a culinary journey" (WaPo).

Most articles about dining

Loading...

alone are about dealing with the predicament of being alone and wanting or needing to eat in a restaurant. But this article has you contemplating an actual preference for being alone while you are with someone else.

It reminds me of that old LSD experiment where the doctor asks the subject — who seems to be having a sublime experience — "Is it all one," and she says "It would be all one if you weren't here." 

But isn't this always the problem with the company of others? Your baseline is how you feel when you're alone, which ought to be just fine. Who is a good enough companion to be better than no one? If you're anxious about being alone, your baseline is too low, and you may end up in conversations that displace superior uses of your consciousness. 

One problem with dining alone is that you might end up wasting your precious consciousness on thoughts about whether solo diners displease the restaurant personnel or whether other people are thinking about how pathetic you are.

Thus articles "The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one."

that is all articles "The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "The next time you’re with a dining companion, consider what might be different if you were a party of one." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2022/05/the-next-time-youre-with-dining.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: