Loading...

"[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title "[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing."
link : "[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing."

"[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing."

"But at least based on present knowledge, an ant cannot possibly make such a showing. Happy is not a human, and an ant is not an elephant... [Happy] is extremely cognitively complex and comes from a highly social, empathetic species of wild animals. Those qualities of elephants make them unique in the animal kingdom, meaning the answer to the question for earthworms, domesticated pets, service animals and many animals subject to medical research, would be entirely different."

Writes Judge Rowan D. Wilson, dissenting, in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project v. Breheny (New York Court of Appeals). 

Here's the NYT article about the case: "Happy the Elephant Isn’t Legally a Person, Top New York Court Rules/An animal advocacy group had argued that the elephant was being illegally detained at the Bronx Zoo, in a case involving deep ethical questions about the basic rights of highly intelligent animals."

A question asked at oral argument of the lawyer representing the Nonhuman Rights Project: "Does that mean I couldn’t keep a dog?" 

Loading...

"But at least based on present knowledge, an ant cannot possibly make such a showing. Happy is not a human, and an ant is not an elephant... [Happy] is extremely cognitively complex and comes from a highly social, empathetic species of wild animals. Those qualities of elephants make them unique in the animal kingdom, meaning the answer to the question for earthworms, domesticated pets, service animals and many animals subject to medical research, would be entirely different."

Writes Judge Rowan D. Wilson, dissenting, in In the Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project v. Breheny (New York Court of Appeals). 

Here's the NYT article about the case: "Happy the Elephant Isn’t Legally a Person, Top New York Court Rules/An animal advocacy group had argued that the elephant was being illegally detained at the Bronx Zoo, in a case involving deep ethical questions about the basic rights of highly intelligent animals."

A question asked at oral argument of the lawyer representing the Nonhuman Rights Project: "Does that mean I couldn’t keep a dog?" 

Thus articles "[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing."

that is all articles "[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "[I]f an ant in an ant farm could establish the same showing that Happy has, the ant would be entitled to a hearing." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2022/06/if-ant-in-ant-farm-could-establish-same.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: