Title : "Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races this fall have spent little time... touting... their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package..."
link : "Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races this fall have spent little time... touting... their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package..."
"Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races this fall have spent little time... touting... their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package..."
"... which party leaders had hoped would help stave off losses in the House and Senate in midterm elections. In part, that is because the rescue plan has become fodder for Republicans to attack Democrats over rapidly rising prices, accusing them of overstimulating the economy with too much cash.... It was initially seen as Mr. Biden’s signature economic policy achievement.... Some Democrats worry that voters have been swayed by the persistent Republican argument that the aid was the driving factor behind rapidly rising prices of food, rent and other daily staples...."
A lot of this article — by Jim Tankersley — is focused on Senator Warnock. It begins:
In the midst of a critical runoff campaign that would determine control of the Senate, the Rev. Raphael Warnock promised Georgia voters that, if elected, he would help President-elect Biden send checks to people digging out of the pandemic recession.
Mr. Warnock won. Democrats delivered payments of up to $1,400 per person.
But this year, as Mr. Warnock is locked in a tight re-election campaign, he barely talks about those checks....
When asked by a reporter why he was not campaigning on an issue that had been so central to his election and whether he thought the payments had contributed to inflation, Mr. Warnock deflected....I guess if Warnock loses — and if Democrats in general lose — the criticism will be that they failed to emphasize all the money — all our money — they spent to benefit us. But aren't they making the right decision? They don't want to call attention to something they did that at least partially caused the inflation that's troubling us all so much — after we spent all the money they gave us. They can't really say, but didn't you like all that money we gave you?
But this NYT article seems to say that the Democrats spent tax money in order to acquire votes in the 2022 elections, so it's confounding that the scheme did not work or that they've decided in advance that it won't work and they're not even attempting to follow the scheme to the end.
"... which party leaders had hoped would help stave off losses in the House and Senate in midterm elections. In part, that is because the rescue plan has become fodder for Republicans to attack Democrats over rapidly rising prices, accusing them of overstimulating the economy with too much cash.... It was initially seen as Mr. Biden’s signature economic policy achievement.... Some Democrats worry that voters have been swayed by the persistent Republican argument that the aid was the driving factor behind rapidly rising prices of food, rent and other daily staples...."
A lot of this article — by Jim Tankersley — is focused on Senator Warnock. It begins:
In the midst of a critical runoff campaign that would determine control of the Senate, the Rev. Raphael Warnock promised Georgia voters that, if elected, he would help President-elect Biden
Mr. Warnock won. Democrats delivered payments of up to $1,400 per person.
But this year, as Mr. Warnock is locked in a tight re-election campaign, he barely talks about those checks....
When asked by a reporter why he was not campaigning on an issue that had been so central to his election and whether he thought the payments had contributed to inflation, Mr. Warnock deflected....I guess if Warnock loses — and if Democrats in general lose — the criticism will be that they failed to emphasize all the money — all our money — they spent to benefit us. But aren't they making the right decision? They don't want to call attention to something they did that at least partially caused the inflation that's troubling us all so much — after we spent all the money they gave us. They can't really say, but didn't you like all that money we gave you?
But this NYT article seems to say that the Democrats spent tax money in order to acquire votes in the 2022 elections, so it's confounding that the scheme did not work or that they've decided in advance that it won't work and they're not even attempting to follow the scheme to the end.
Thus articles "Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races this fall have spent little time... touting... their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package..."
You now read the article "Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races this fall have spent little time... touting... their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package..." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2022/10/democratic-candidates-in-competitive.html
Related Posts :
DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE A DEMOCRAT ?: The Inconvenient Truth About the Democratic Party- Moira Donegan, the young woman who put the "Shitty Media Men" spreadsheet on line.
North Korea Cancels Trip By Its Advance Team To South Korea For Its Arts Performers
47 119 228 474 | Michael Phelps speaks on suicide, January 19, 2018 (The most perfect day of the year to do so)
ESPN says Patriots will be best team in the NFL in 2018-19, January 19, 2018 (AFC Championship hasn't even been played yet for this season...)
0 Response to ""Democratic candidates in competitive Senate races this fall have spent little time... touting... their party’s $1.9 trillion economic rescue package...""
Post a Comment