Title : "Ms. Thomas and her husband were foster parents for their two grandsons for nearly a year and a half...."
link : "Ms. Thomas and her husband were foster parents for their two grandsons for nearly a year and a half...."
"Ms. Thomas and her husband were foster parents for their two grandsons for nearly a year and a half...."
"The expense reimbursements, day care support and a $200-per-year stipend for each child had been a big help, but the imposing child welfare requirements — including monthly visits from social workers — made Ms. Thomas want to live with her grandsons like a normal family. In April she and her husband took guardianship of the boys, which relieved them of the foster care requirements, but the decision came at a cost: They lost the expense reimbursements and the day care support.... $2,700 per month in day care costs [is] more than her $2,300 monthly income...."
From the end of the NYT article "Can ‘Kinship Care’ Help the Child Welfare System? The White House Wants to Try/The Biden administration proposes spending $20 billion over a decade to help some of the most vulnerable families in the country, including relatives suddenly thrust into child rearing."
So the "child welfare requirements — including monthly visits from social worker" are so onerous, that the grandparents preferred to pay the expenses themselves and have the freedom and privacy given to guardians. How is the Biden administration going to help people in their position? I would think retired grandparents like the Thomases are less in need of reimbursement of day care costs than many parents who are taking care of their own children.
And, yes, they were retired, though, we're told, Ms. Thomas "returned to work... to supplement the costs of caring for the children, who will need several types of therapies indefinitely." Why would you return to work to make less than the cost of day care? If you stay home, you don't need day care. Or do you? Is that the belief now, that children ought to be in day care to get a better start at education and socialization?
How would the administration’s proposals could help the Thomases?
[T]he administration wants to increase the number of foster children who live with relatives, known as “kinship care,” by reimbursing states at a higher rate if they place children with family members instead of in group homes or institutions.
The Thomases already had status as foster parents, and they didn't like it and moved on to guardianship.
The administration also proposes more money for programs that help such families, and to expand a tax credit to include people who take legal guardianship of young family members.....
So, they would get included in a tax credit hasn't covered people like them but does cover something that isn't stated in the article. Details about the proposal are skimpy in this article that is heavily laden with information about the Thomases and another grandparent.
"The expense reimbursements, day care support and a $200-per-year stipend for each child had been a big help, but the imposing child welfare requirements — including monthly visits from social workers — made Ms. Thomas want to live with her grandsons like a normal family. In April she and her husband took guardianship of the boys, which relieved them of the foster care requirements, but the decision came at a cost: They lost the expense reimbursements and the day care support.... $2,700 per month in day care costs [is] more than her $2,300 monthly income...."
From the end of the NYT article "Can ‘Kinship Care’ Help the Child Welfare System? The White House Wants to Try/The Biden administration proposes spending $20 billion over a decade to help some of the most vulnerable families in the country, including relatives suddenly thrust into child rearing."
So the "child welfare requirements — including monthly visits from social worker" are so onerous, that the grandparents preferred to pay the expenses themselves and have the freedom and privacy given to guardians. How is the Biden administration going to help people in their position? I would think retired grandparents like the Thomases are less in need of reimbursement of day care costs than many parents who are taking care of their own children.
And, yes, they were retired, though, we're told, Ms. Thomas "returned to work... to supplement the costs of caring for the children, who will need several types of therapies indefinitely." Why would you return to work to make less than the cost of day care? If you stay home, you don't need day care. Or do you? Is that the belief now, that children ought to be in day care to get a better start at education and socialization?
How would the administration’s proposals could help the Thomases?
[T]he administration wants to increase the number of foster children who live with relatives, known as “kinship care,” by reimbursing states at a higher rate if they place children with family members instead of in group homes or institutions.
The Thomases already had status as foster parents, and they didn't like it and moved on to guardianship.
The administration also proposes more money for programs that help such families, and to expand a tax credit to include people who take legal guardianship of young family members.....
So, they would get included in a tax credit hasn't covered people like them but does cover something that isn't stated in the article. Details about the proposal are skimpy in this article that is heavily laden with information about the Thomases and another grandparent.
Thus articles "Ms. Thomas and her husband were foster parents for their two grandsons for nearly a year and a half...."
You now read the article "Ms. Thomas and her husband were foster parents for their two grandsons for nearly a year and a half...." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2022/10/ms-thomas-and-her-husband-were-foster.html
0 Response to ""Ms. Thomas and her husband were foster parents for their two grandsons for nearly a year and a half....""
Post a Comment