Title : "But the new flood of money — and the way many female athletes are attaining it — troubles some who have fought for equitable treatment in women’s sports..."
link : "But the new flood of money — and the way many female athletes are attaining it — troubles some who have fought for equitable treatment in women’s sports..."
"But the new flood of money — and the way many female athletes are attaining it — troubles some who have fought for equitable treatment in women’s sports..."
"... and say that it rewards traditional feminine desirability over athletic excellence. And while the female athletes I spoke to said they were consciously deciding whether to play up or down their sexuality, some observers say that the market is dictating that choice. Andrea Geurin, a researcher of sports business at Loughborough University in England, studied female athletes trying to make the Rio Olympics in 2016, many of them American collegians. 'One of the big themes that came out is the pressure that they felt to post suggestive or sexy photos of themselves' on social media, Geurin said.... Scroll through the social media posts from female college athletes across the United States and you will find that a significant through line on many of the women’s accounts is the well-trod and well-proven notion that sexiness sells."1. Is it regressive of WaPo to illustrate that article with many photos of scantily clad lovely young women?
2. Once we're following sports at all, we're staring at the bodies of people with great bodies. We're talking about spectator sports. What part of spectating is superior to other parts of spectating?
3. When you participate in sports, isn't some part of what you are doing about trying to look good?
4. The article conflates good looks and sexiness. The only "sexiness" it's talking about is good looks. Ironically, that's retrograde. If a woman is just being seen looking great, to say she's using her sexuality is sexist.
From "New
1. Is it regressive of WaPo to illustrate that article with many photos of scantily clad lovely young women?
2. Once we're following sports at all, we're staring at the bodies of people with great bodies. We're talking about spectator sports. What part of spectating is superior to other parts of spectating?
3. When you participate in sports, isn't some part of what you are doing about trying to look good?
4. The article conflates good looks and sexiness. The only "sexiness" it's talking about is good looks. Ironically, that's retrograde. If a woman is just being seen looking great, to say she's using her sexuality is sexist.
Thus articles "But the new flood of money — and the way many female athletes are attaining it — troubles some who have fought for equitable treatment in women’s sports..."
You now read the article "But the new flood of money — and the way many female athletes are attaining it — troubles some who have fought for equitable treatment in women’s sports..." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2022/11/but-new-flood-of-money-and-way-many.html
0 Response to ""But the new flood of money — and the way many female athletes are attaining it — troubles some who have fought for equitable treatment in women’s sports...""
Post a Comment