Loading...

WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story. - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story.
link : WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story.

WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story.

So we get this awkward amalgam:

These stories are not connected, but they are put together, I suspect, to intensify concern about long-term global warming, which, to me — living where the air quality index is 270 at the moment — feels like a failure to take the smoke problem seriously. It's often hot in the summer in the south! This smoke is something I have never seen in my life. It's actively unhealthy for millions of Americans. After staying home for years hiding from a virus, I am now hiding from the air. On Twitter, I'm seeing conspiracy theories. The mainstream media treating this problem as a phenomenon on the level of 100° temperatures in Texas in the summer is going to make some of us paranoid.

Here's the kind of material I'm seeing, from that first headline:

Scientists said climate change helped shape the weather conditions that were causing misery and putting lives at risk from Mexico to Canada. There was no disputing the impact: If it wasn’t way too smoky, it was way too hot.

"No disputing the impact"?! The condition exists, and there's no disputing that, but to say "impact" is to make an assertion about the cause. I guess the word "helped" is supposed to fudge everything. There's climate change — who knows how much? — and it has some effect on the amount of smoke produced in a fire and how that smoke moves around — who know how much? — so it "helped" the conditions that had the "impact." Scientists said. But let's move on: It's way too smoky, right? We sure do know that. Idiocy! 

So we get this awkward amalgam:

These stories are not connected, but they are put together, I suspect, to intensify concern about long-term global warming, which, to me — living where the air quality index is 270 at the moment — feels like a failure to take the smoke problem seriously. It's often hot in the summer in the south! This smoke is something I have never seen in my life. It's actively unhealthy for millions of Americans. After staying home for years hiding from a virus, I am now hiding from the air. On Twitter, I'm seeing conspiracy theories. The mainstream media treating this problem as a phenomenon on the level of 100° temperatures in Texas in the summer is going to

Loading...

make some of us paranoid.

Here's the kind of material I'm seeing, from that first headline:

Scientists said climate change helped shape the weather conditions that were causing misery and putting lives at risk from Mexico to Canada. There was no disputing the impact: If it wasn’t way too smoky, it was way too hot.

"No disputing the impact"?! The condition exists, and there's no disputing that, but to say "impact" is to make an assertion about the cause. I guess the word "helped" is supposed to fudge everything. There's climate change — who knows how much? — and it has some effect on the amount of smoke produced in a fire and how that smoke moves around — who know how much? — so it "helped" the conditions that had the "impact." Scientists said. But let's move on: It's way too smoky, right? We sure do know that. Idiocy! 

Thus articles WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story.

that is all articles WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article WaPo seems to want to write about the heat but you can't elevate the heat story over the smoke story. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2023/06/wapo-seems-to-want-to-write-about-heat.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: