Loading...
Title : "Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not."
link : "Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not."
"Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not."
"All you are doing is affirming I’m a woman. All you're doing is saying that trans women are women, because, for some reason, people like to sexualize women's bodies and say that they are inappropriate. My transmasculine friends were showing off their top surgery scars and living in joy. I wanted to join them. And because it is perfectly within the law in Washington, D.C., I decided to join them — and cover my nipples, just to play it safe, because I wanted to be fully free in myself. I had zero intention of trying to be vulgar or be profane in any way. I was simply living in joy — living my truth and existing in my body. Happy Pride!"Said Rose Montoya, in video I watched at "White House Condemns 'Disrespectful' Trans Model for Baring Breasts at White House Pride Event/'Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events,' a White House spokesperson tells The Messenger of footage Rose Montoya posted to social media" (The Messenger).
I transcribed the quote, only some of which appears at The Messenger, which is a new publication to me. It's been around since May and was started by the former owner of The Hill. I'll keep an eye on it. Here, it seems focused on protecting President Biden, who invited Montoya to a White House event and apparently needs distance from this kind of exuberance.
Under lesbian, the school stated a definition in the glossary: "A non-man attracted to non-men. While past definitions refer to ‘lesbian’ as a woman who is emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually attracted to other women, this updated definition includes non-binary people who may also identify with the label."
In contrast, the school listed "gay men" in its glossary as: "A man who is emotionally, romantically, sexually, affectionately, or relationally attracted to other men, or who identifies as a member of the gay community."
"At times, 'gay' is used to refer to all people, regardless of gender, who have their primary sexual and or romantic attractions to people of the same gender. 'Gay' is an adjective (not a noun) as in 'He is a gay man,'" it continued.
It was as though there was a taboo on saying "woman."
J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter books series who's been critical of transgender inclusion, mocked the definition on Twitter Tuesday. "Man: no definition needed. Non-man (formerly known as woman): a being definable only by reference to the male," the author wrote in a tweet that included an image of the glossary. "An absence, a vacuum where there's no man-ness."
The article leads with a quote from the schools "director of media relations":
"Upon becoming aware of the language in question, we have begun working to determine the origin and context of the glossary’s definitions. We have removed the page from our website while we gather more information."
So, here too, The Messenger is assisting institutional insiders who need distance from more radical voices.
Loading...
"All you are doing is affirming I’m a woman. All you're doing is saying that trans women are women, because, for some reason, people like to sexualize women's bodies and say that they are inappropriate. My transmasculine friends were showing off their top surgery scars and living in joy. I wanted to join them. And because it is perfectly within the law in Washington, D.C., I decided to join them — and cover my nipples, just to play it safe, because I wanted to be fully free in myself. I had zero intention of trying to be vulgar or be profane in any way. I was simply living in joy — living my truth and existing in my body. Happy Pride!"
Said Rose Montoya, in video I watched at "White House Condemns 'Disrespectful' Trans Model for Baring Breasts at White House Pride Event/'Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events,' a White House spokesperson tells The Messenger of footage Rose Montoya posted to social media" (The Messenger).
AND: Checking out The Messenger, I see "Johns Hopkins Says It Pulled Lesbian Definition from Its LGBTQ Glossary After Backlash/Critics accused the university of erasing women when it wrote that a lesbian is a 'non-man attracted to non-men.'"
Said Rose Montoya, in video I watched at "White House Condemns 'Disrespectful' Trans Model for Baring Breasts at White House Pride Event/'Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events,' a White House spokesperson tells The Messenger of footage Rose Montoya posted to social media" (The Messenger).
I transcribed the quote, only some of which appears at The Messenger, which is a new publication to me. It's been around since May and was started by the former owner of The Hill. I'll keep an eye on it. Here, it seems focused on protecting President Biden, who invited Montoya to a White House event and apparently needs distance from this kind of exuberance.
Under lesbian, the school stated a definition in the glossary: "A non-man attracted to non-men. While past definitions refer to ‘lesbian’ as a woman who is emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually attracted to other women, this updated definition includes non-binary people who may also identify with the label."
In contrast, the school listed "gay men" in its glossary as: "A man who is emotionally, romantically, sexually, affectionately, or relationally attracted to other men, or who identifies as a member of the gay community."
"At times, 'gay' is used to refer to all people, regardless of gender, who have their primary sexual and or romantic attractions to people of the same gender. 'Gay' is an adjective (not a noun) as in 'He is a gay man,'" it continued.
It was as though there was a taboo on saying "woman."
J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter books series who's been critical of transgender inclusion, mocked the definition on Twitter Tuesday. "Man: no definition needed. Non-man (formerly known as woman): a being definable only by reference to the male," the author wrote in a tweet that included an image of the glossary. "An absence, a vacuum where there's no man-ness."
The article leads with a quote from the schools "director of media relations":
"Upon becoming aware of the language in question, we have begun working to determine the origin and context of the glossary’s definitions. We have removed the page from our website while we gather more information."
So, here too, The Messenger is assisting institutional insiders who need distance from more radical voices.
Thus articles "Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not."
that is all articles "Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2023/06/why-is-my-chest-now-deemed.html
0 Response to ""Why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However before coming out as trans it was not.""
Post a Comment