Loading...
Title : "During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad."
link : "During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad."
"During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad."
"Later, doctors and psychologists came to the (wrong) conclusion that overweight people were lazy, and society adjudicated heaviness a 'disgrace,' in the words of Lulu Hunt Peters, an early diet-book author. Dieting organizations ruthlessly shamed people into losing weight. In the early ’50s, one such 'support' group held public weigh-ins and forced members who’d gained weight to stand in a 'pig line,' where they would sing a song that included the lyric 'We are plump little pigs who ate too much, fat, fat, fat.'"Writes Olga Khazan in "People Just Want to Lose Weight/Americans go on yo-yo diets, but we also have a yo-yo relationship to dieting" (The Atlantic).These days, of course, "we’ve conceded that dieting people don’t want to be moral, patriotic, or shamed. They just want to lose weight. That desire has always been value-neutral. But now it’s more attainable."
What's more attainable? The "desire" — that is, the desire to lose weight? I think she means actually losing weight is more attainable. The article is mostly about Noom and those new drugs like Ozempic. But people were less obese in the old days — whether that was because of the shaming and moralizing, I have no idea.
Loading...
"Later, doctors and psychologists came to the (wrong) conclusion that overweight people were lazy, and society adjudicated heaviness a 'disgrace,' in the words of Lulu Hunt Peters, an early diet-book author. Dieting organizations ruthlessly shamed people into losing weight. In the early ’50s, one such 'support' group held public weigh-ins and forced members who’d gained weight to stand in a 'pig line,' where they would sing a song that included the lyric 'We are plump little pigs who ate too much, fat, fat, fat.'"Writes Olga Khazan in "People Just Want to Lose Weight/Americans go on yo-yo diets, but we also have a yo-yo relationship to dieting" (The Atlantic).
These days, of course, "we’ve conceded that dieting people don’t want to be moral, patriotic, or shamed. They just want to lose weight. That desire has always been value-neutral. But now it’s more attainable."
What's more attainable? The "desire" — that is, the desire to lose weight? I think she means actually losing weight is more attainable. The article is mostly about Noom and those new drugs like Ozempic. But people were less obese in the old days — whether that was because of the shaming and moralizing, I have no idea.
Thus articles "During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad."
that is all articles "During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2023/07/during-world-war-i-eating-less-was.html
0 Response to ""During World War I, eating less was considered patriotic, a way of freeing up precious caloric resources for American troops fighting abroad.""
Post a Comment