Loading...

I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why." - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why."
link : I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why."

I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why."

That's in the Wall Street Journal. Subheadline: "Rather than lean in, young workers say they want jobs that can be done from home, come with a cool boss and end at 5 p.m. sharp."

Here's the Instapundit link. Quips: "Career goal of the moment" and "it’s unfair if women get paid less than men."

I was thinking about blogging that "Lazy-Girl Job" story yesterday. Quip: I was too lazy.

But looking at it this morning, I'm remembering that's exactly how I felt when I graduated from art school in 1973. I remember scanning the "help wanted" ads in The New York Times and seeing jobs described as "fun." I actually got a fun job too — reading magazines and hanging out with 2 other young women. We had to write code numbers on every article, but we had endless material to talk and joke about. In my extra time — which was ample — I read whatever books I wanted (and chose classic literature like "The Red and the Black"). We could wear whatever we wanted. I wore jeans and T-shirts. One of my co-workers, a fan of the "glitter rock" of the day, wore 9-inch platform shoes. 

Anyway, that WSJ is from July, so why was I reading it yesterday? I don't know, but Instapundit has me looking at it today. Some excerpts from the article:

The phenomenon, essentially the opposite of “leaning in,” has detractors, who say that aspiring to a lazy-girl job is the wrong attitude for building a meaningful career. Yet, many young women who have branded themselves “lazy girls” online insist they are anything but. After growing up hearing about the horrors of overwork, they say they’re happy in their jobs and celebrate striking work-life balance gold....

Like quiet quitting before it, the lazy-girl job is the latest iteration of 20- and 30-somethings of both genders redrawing the blurry line between life and work postpandemic....

Michael Durwin, a senior social-media strategist, says he isn’t antiwork, but does believe American hustle culture is toxic at times. He doesn’t understand why a woman would brand herself a “lazy girl,” though he gets the ethos behind the movement.

I think a truly lazy person doesn't openly use this term. Those who use it are probably getting their job done competently. I know I was in that market research position I described above. There was a specific job to be done, and we got it done efficiently, but we remained in touch with our freedom. I think someone today using the term "lazy girl" is displaying confidence that her work is valuable and deserving of a salary but also that affirming her entitlement to all of the freedom around the edges of the job — control over the time and place of her (or his) work.

Look around you in real life. Who are the people who declare "I'm lazy"? They're not the truly lazy ones, but the ones tempted into overwork and excessive scrupulousness or needless display of earnest industriousness. They ought to find a way to lighten up and throw off their imaginary overseer. 

Here's the famous TikTok on the subject:

That's in the Wall Street Journal. Subheadline: "Rather than lean in, young workers say they want jobs that can be done from home, come with a cool boss and end at 5 p.m. sharp."

Here's the Instapundit link. Quips: "Career goal of the moment" and "it’s unfair if women get paid less than men."

I was thinking about blogging that "Lazy-Girl Job" story yesterday. Quip: I was too lazy.

But looking at it this morning, I'm remembering that's exactly how I felt when I graduated from art school in 1973. I remember scanning the "help wanted" ads in The New York Times and seeing jobs described as "fun." I actually got a fun job too — reading magazines and hanging out with 2 other young women. We had to write code numbers on every article, but we had endless material to talk and joke about. In my extra time — which was ample — I read whatever books I wanted (and chose classic literature like "The Red and the Black"). We could wear whatever we wanted. I wore jeans and T-shirts. One of my co-workers, a fan of the "glitter rock" of the day, wore 9-inch platform shoes. 

Anyway, that WSJ is from July, so why was I reading it yesterday? I don't know, but Instapundit has me looking at it today. Some excerpts from the article:

The phenomenon, essentially the opposite of “leaning in,” has detractors, who say that aspiring to a lazy-girl job is the wrong attitude for building a meaningful career. Yet, many young women who have branded themselves “lazy girls” online insist they are anything but. After growing up hearing about the horrors of overwork, they say they’re happy in their jobs and celebrate striking work-life balance gold....

Like quiet quitting before it, the lazy-girl job is the latest iteration of 20- and 30-somethings of both genders redrawing the blurry line between life and work postpandemic....

Michael Durwin, a senior social-media strategist, says he isn’t antiwork, but does believe American

Loading...

href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-backlash-against-quiet-quitting-is-getting-loud-11661391232?mod=article_inline">hustle culture is toxic at times. He doesn’t understand why a woman would brand herself a “lazy girl,” though he gets the ethos behind the movement.

I think a truly lazy person doesn't openly use this term. Those who use it are probably getting their job done competently. I know I was in that market research position I described above. There was a specific job to be done, and we got it done efficiently, but we remained in touch with our freedom. I think someone today using the term "lazy girl" is displaying confidence that her work is valuable and deserving of a salary but also that affirming her entitlement to all of the freedom around the edges of the job — control over the time and place of her (or his) work.

Look around you in real life. Who are the people who declare "I'm lazy"? They're not the truly lazy ones, but the ones tempted into overwork and excessive scrupulousness or needless display of earnest industriousness. They ought to find a way to lighten up and throw off their imaginary overseer. 

Here's the famous TikTok on the subject:

Thus articles I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why."

that is all articles I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article I see Instapundit is linking to "The ‘Lazy-Girl Job’ Is In Right Now. Here’s Why." with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2023/09/i-see-instapundit-is-linking-to-lazy.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: