Loading...

Toxic.

Loading...
Toxic. - Hallo friend WELCOME TO AMERICA, In the article you read this time with the title Toxic., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article AMERICA, Article CULTURAL, Article ECONOMIC, Article POLITICAL, Article SECURITY, Article SOCCER, Article SOCIAL, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Toxic.
link : Toxic.

see also


Toxic.

There's a WaPo article with the headline, "How to give up smoking weed (or other toxic habits you’re tired of)/Quitting marijuana, cigarettes and alcohol was tougher than the writer expected. She shares what works and what didn’t." The last line of the article is: "When I gave up toxic habits, I had room for something more beautiful to take their place."

And the comments are loaded with people resisting the notion that marijuana is "toxic":
"Again, the Post treats addiction to alcohol and nicotine the same as the use of the non-addictive cannabis. Why the lie? Why the supposition cannabis use by adults is 'toxic'? I don't use any intoxicants. Haven't for more than three decades. Cannabis is medicine."
"On what planet is smoking weed a 'toxic habit'? Spare us. Weed isn’t the problem, YOU are the problem."

"What is the basis for referring to marijuana — something that is prescribed to certain people — as 'toxic'?"

"Toxic" just means harmful to your health. The word is used pretty casually these days — including figuratively, in expressions like "toxic masculinity" — so why get so excited?

There's an insistence on a medicine/intoxicant distinction, but isn't that about using something to treat a health problem as opposed to using it to get high? Are marijuana users these days into denying that their purpose is to get high? They'd be okay with normal, but they are worse than normal, and they need a substance to get where they'd be naturally if they were not — in some way — ill? Is getting high just a collateral effect as they strive to get well?

Loading...
There's a WaPo article with the headline, "How to give up smoking weed (or other toxic habits you’re tired of)/Quitting marijuana, cigarettes and alcohol was tougher than the writer expected. She shares what works and what didn’t." The last line of the article is: "When I gave up toxic habits, I had room for something more beautiful to take their place."

And the comments are loaded with people resisting the notion that marijuana is "toxic":
"Again, the Post treats addiction to alcohol and nicotine the same as the use of the non-addictive cannabis. Why the lie? Why the supposition cannabis use by adults is 'toxic'? I don't use any intoxicants. Haven't for more than three decades. Cannabis is medicine."
"On what planet is smoking weed a 'toxic habit'? Spare us. Weed isn’t the problem, YOU are the problem."

"What is the basis for referring to marijuana — something that is prescribed to certain people — as 'toxic'?"

"Toxic" just means harmful to your health. The word is used pretty casually these days — including figuratively, in expressions like "toxic masculinity" — so why get so excited?

There's an insistence on a medicine/intoxicant distinction, but isn't that about using something to treat a health problem as opposed to using it to get high? Are marijuana users these days into denying that their purpose is to get high? They'd be okay with normal, but they are worse than normal, and they need a substance to get where they'd be naturally if they were not — in some way — ill? Is getting high just a collateral effect as they strive to get well?



Thus articles Toxic.

that is all articles Toxic. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Toxic. with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2023/12/toxic.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Toxic."

Post a Comment

Loading...