Loading...
Title : Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.)
link : Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.)
Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.)
From the NYT live-blogging:
[U]ntil Mr. Trump wound up in court, the Supreme Court has never had a reason to decide whether former presidents are protected from being prosecuted for official actions. The Justice Department has long maintained that sitting presidents are temporarily immune from prosecution because criminal charges would distract them from their constitutional functions.... The closest the country has come to the prosecution of a former president over official actions came in 1974, when Richard M. Nixon resigned to avoid being impeached over the Watergate scandal. But a pardon by his successor, President Gerald Ford, protected Nixon from indictment by the Watergate special prosecutor. Mr. Smith’s team has argued that Ford’s pardon — and Nixon’s acceptance of it — demonstrates that both understood that Nixon was not already immune....
And:
A lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump told a federal appeals court panel... that impeachment is the only way to address criminal conduct by a sitting president, even one who ordered an elite commando unit to assassinate a political rival....
Also:
The former president arrived at the courthouse before the hearing even though he is not required to be there — and appellate judges often prefer to hear cases as intellectual exercises without the presence of defendants....
Winning the appeal is only one of Mr. Trump’s goals. He is also hoping that the litigation can eat up enough time to postpone the election trial — now set to start in early March — until after Election Day. If he retakes the White House, he could seek to order the charges against him to be dropped or try to pardon himself....
Loading...
From the NYT live-blogging:
[U]ntil Mr. Trump wound up in court, the Supreme Court has never had a reason to decide whether former presidents are protected from being prosecuted for official actions. The Justice Department has long maintained that sitting presidents are temporarily immune from prosecution because criminal charges would distract them from their constitutional functions.... The closest the country has come to the prosecution of a former president over official actions came in 1974, when Richard M. Nixon resigned to avoid being impeached over the Watergate scandal. But a pardon by his successor, President Gerald Ford, protected Nixon from indictment by the Watergate special prosecutor. Mr. Smith’s team has argued that Ford’s pardon — and Nixon’s acceptance of it — demonstrates that both understood that Nixon was not already immune....
And:
A lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump told a federal appeals court panel... that impeachment is the only way to address criminal conduct by a sitting president, even one who ordered an elite commando unit to assassinate a political rival....
Also:
The former president arrived at the courthouse before the hearing even though he is not required to be there — and appellate judges often prefer to hear cases as intellectual exercises without the presence of defendants....
Winning the appeal is only one of Mr. Trump’s goals. He is also hoping that the litigation can eat up enough time to postpone the election trial — now set to start in early March — until after Election Day. If he retakes the White House, he could seek to order the charges against him to be dropped or try to pardon himself....
Thus articles Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.)
that is all articles Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.) This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.) with the link address https://welcometoamerican.blogspot.com/2024/01/listen-to-argument-in-united-states-v.html
0 Response to "Listen to the argument in United States v. Trump. (The issue is presidential immunity.)"
Post a Comment